Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Industrom Power LLC currently manages 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This pending matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a singular focus for the company's current patent office interactions. The limited scope of 1 pending office action suggests a specific technical objective within the mechanical engineering field. This allows the prosecution team to focus on the requirements of a single examiner and art unit without the need to coordinate across multiple administrative groups.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is KOSANOVIC, HELENA, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the total count of pending office actions is 1, this examiner handles the entire current workload. The prosecution path for this portfolio is currently defined by the requirements of this 1 distinct art unit and the specific examiner assigned to the case. Effectively addressing the concerns of this 1 distinct examiner is the primary task for advancing the company's current patent interests in this technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOSANOVIC, HELENA | 1 | 45.0% | +14.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18340286 | Intercooled Cascade Cycle Waste Heat Recovery System | KOSANOVIC, HELENA | 342d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3762 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18340286 | Intercooled Cascade Cycle Waste Heat Recovery System | KOSANOVIC, HELENA | 3762 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 342d overdue | Pending | Jun 23, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial