Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days
Innogrit Technologies Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This shows a very focused prosecution profile where the company's current patent office activity is limited to one specific point of contact and one technical division. The company must address the specific technical requirements of the Computing & Software area as interpreted by this 1 examiner and the 1 art unit where the action is pending.
The busiest examiner identified is WARREN, TRACY A, who is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner represents the total pending workload for the company. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution strategy is highly concentrated. This concentration allows for a focus on the specific standards and interpretations of a single examiner during the current phase of portfolio development. Such a focused environment may lead to more predictable outcomes if the examiner's tendencies are well understood. The presence of 1 distinct examiner across 1 distinct art unit ensures that the 1 pending office action is subject to a singular technical perspective.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WARREN, TRACY A | 1 | 81.9% | +6.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18908602 | ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK FOR IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF COMPUTER MEMORY SYSTEM | WARREN, TRACY A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2137 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18908602 | ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK FOR IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF COMPUTER MEMORY SYSTEM | WARREN, TRACY A | 2137 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial