Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Integroenergy Technologies LLC currently has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and multiple art units. This ratio of actions to examiners and art units means that each pending application is being evaluated by a unique individual in a unique technical group within the patent office.
JONATHAN MILLER is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. With pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, no single examiner dominates the company's active prosecution. The presence of 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's chemistry-related filings are being processed through different specialized channels. Practitioners should be prepared to manage separate prosecution tracks, each with its own examiner and art unit context. This arrangement of distinct examiners for the pending office actions suggests a diverse approach to the company's materials science innovations.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MILLER, JONATHAN | 1 | 79.9% | +18.1% |
| CHAWLA, JYOTI | 1 | 52.7% | +30.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18816904 | DIRECT RECTIFICATION OF MOLECULAR SIEVE REGENERANT AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME | MILLER, JONATHAN | 15d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18816904 | DIRECT RECTIFICATION OF MOLECULAR SIEVE REGENERANT AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME | MILLER, JONATHAN | 15d |
| 18489953 | PREFLASH SYSTEM AND METHOD | CHAWLA, JYOTI | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1772 | 1 |
| 1791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18816904 | DIRECT RECTIFICATION OF MOLECULAR SIEVE REGENERANT AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME | MILLER, JONATHAN | 1772 | §101§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Aug 27, 2024 |
| 18489953 | PREFLASH SYSTEM AND METHOD | CHAWLA, JYOTI | 1791 | §103 | Final Rejection | 28d | Pending | Oct 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial