Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Intelligent Fusion Technology Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Intelligent Fusion Technology Inc. has 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are spread across 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a diverse range of technical review. This distribution suggests that the company is pursuing multiple innovations that span different sub-specialties within the transportation and mechanical sectors.

The busiest examiner, RIFKIN, BEN M, is responsible for 1 pending action. With the 3 pending office actions distributed among different examiners, the company must manage multiple prosecution tracks simultaneously. The fact that these actions are split between 2 distinct art units further emphasizes the need for a versatile strategy to address the unique requirements of each examiner. Practitioners should note that with multiple distinct examiners involved, the company's success depends on navigating different individual perspectives.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RIFKIN, BEN M 1 44.2% +17.1%
ZHU, NOAH YI MIN 1 80.5% +14.5%
RUTTEN, JAMES D 1 63.3% +37.7%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18324986 Method, System and Storage Medium for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Aircraft Engine Based on Gaussian Process Regression Integrated Deep Learning RUTTEN, JAMES D 49d
18428822 MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING USING EXPLAINABLE REINFORCEMENT LEARNING RIFKIN, BEN M —
18461825 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LINEAR FREQUENCY-MODULATED CONTINUOUS-WAVE (LFMCW) RADAR ZHU, NOAH YI MIN —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18324986 Method, System and Storage Medium for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Aircraft Engine Based on Gaussian Process Regression Integrated Deep Learning RUTTEN, JAMES D 49d
18428822 MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING USING EXPLAINABLE REINFORCEMENT LEARNING RIFKIN, BEN M —
18461825 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LINEAR FREQUENCY-MODULATED CONTINUOUS-WAVE (LFMCW) RADAR ZHU, NOAH YI MIN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3648 1
2121 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18428822 MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING USING EXPLAINABLE REINFORCEMENT LEARNING RIFKIN, BEN M — §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 31, 2024
18461825 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LINEAR FREQUENCY-MODULATED CONTINUOUS-WAVE (LFMCW) RADAR ZHU, NOAH YI MIN 3648 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2023
18324986 Method, System and Storage Medium for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Aircraft Engine Based on Gaussian Process Regression Integrated Deep Learning RUTTEN, JAMES D 2121 §103§112 Final Rejection 49d Pending May 28, 2023

Managing Intelligent Fusion Technology Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month