Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Intergraph Corporation

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Intergraph Corporation has 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Each of these actions is assigned to a different art unit, as the portfolio is spread across 3 distinct art units. This distribution shows a lack of overlap in the specific technical groups reviewing their applications, requiring the company to navigate three different sets of administrative and technical standards within the patent office.

The company interacts with 3 distinct examiners for these filings. AUSTIN, JAMIE H is the busiest examiner, though he is responsible for only 1 pending office action. This distribution shows that the current workload is evenly divided among the assigned examiners across 3 separate technical groups. For practitioners, this means that every active case represents a unique examiner relationship, with no single examiner holding more influence over the portfolio than another. The company must manage 3 separate dialogues to advance its 3 pending actions, each within a unique art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AUSTIN, JAMIE H 1 24.9% +32.7%
ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A 1 58.5% +20.3%
TRAINOR, DANIEL BRENNAN 1 83.3% +37.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18141455 CLOUD-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTION OF PYTHON SCRIPTS TRAINOR, DANIEL BRENNAN —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19076763 DATABRIDGE WITH DATAFLOW STUDIO AUSTIN, JAMIE H —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18407886 METHOD FOR CONTROL OF TRAFFIC REGULATION AGENTS OF A ROAD NETWORK ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A 27d
19076763 DATABRIDGE WITH DATAFLOW STUDIO AUSTIN, JAMIE H —
18141455 CLOUD-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTION OF PYTHON SCRIPTS TRAINOR, DANIEL BRENNAN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3625 1
3668 1
2198 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19076763 DATABRIDGE WITH DATAFLOW STUDIO AUSTIN, JAMIE H 3625 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 11, 2025
18407886 METHOD FOR CONTROL OF TRAFFIC REGULATION AGENTS OF A ROAD NETWORK ALGEHAIM, MOHAMED A 3668 §103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Jan 09, 2024
18141455 CLOUD-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTION OF PYTHON SCRIPTS TRAINOR, DANIEL BRENNAN 2198 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 30, 2023

Managing Intergraph Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Intergraph Corporation have?

Intergraph Corporation has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Intergraph Corporation applications?

Jamie H Austin has the most, with 1 of Intergraph Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Intergraph Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month