Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Intra-cellular Therapies Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

9 pending office actions • 6 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Intra-cellular Therapies Inc. is managing 9 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed among 9 distinct examiners, meaning every pending matter is handled by a different individual. This distribution of examiners shows a variety of perspectives across the company's active applications.

The 9 pending actions are situated within 6 distinct art units. This indicates that while the examiners are unique for every action, some art units are handling more than 1 application for the company. The count of 6 art units compared to 9 examiners shows that the technical focus is more consolidated than the individual examiner assignments. Practitioners must navigate the specific nuances of 6 different art unit environments.

KIFLE, BRUCK is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Given that there are 9 distinct examiners for 9 actions, no individual examiner holds more than 1 pending action. This lack of examiner concentration means the company must tailor its prosecution strategies to 9 different sets of examiner preferences within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (11%)
6
Medium (67%)
2
Easy (22%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (33%)
Double-patenting only2 (22%)
Double-patenting + other3 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KIFLE, BRUCK 1 79.2% +15.9%
ABDALHAMEED, MANAHIL MIRGHANI ALI 1 50.3% +38.2%
SHIAO, REI TSANG 1 79.8% -33.6%
O DELL, DAVID K 1 57.7% +36.0%
RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, VALERIE 1 68.9% +31.8%
CHONG, YONG SOO 1 43.8% +41.6%
FETTEROLF, BRANDON J 1 52.0% +17.4%
SHOWALTER, ALEXANDER KEITH 1 54.4% +26.3%
LEE, ANDREW P 1 48.3% +23.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18866978 NOVEL METHODS KIFLE, BRUCK —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18007018 NOVEL USES SHOWALTER, ALEXANDER KEITH 60d overdue
18042103 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS FETTEROLF, BRANDON J 3d overdue
18866978 NOVEL METHODS KIFLE, BRUCK —
18847121 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ABDALHAMEED, MANAHIL MIRGHANI ALI —
18741740 SUBSTITUTED HETEROCYCLE FUSED GAMMA-CARBOLINES SYNTHESIS O DELL, DAVID K —
18481168 NOVEL METHODS RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, VALERIE —
18320173 NOVEL METHODS CHONG, YONG SOO —
17127867 METHODS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA TREATMENT LEE, ANDREW P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1621 1
1600 1
1623 1
1626 1
1629 1
1691 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18866978 NOVEL METHODS KIFLE, BRUCK — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18847121 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ABDALHAMEED, MANAHIL MIRGHANI ALI — §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18777765 NOVEL METHODS SHIAO, REI TSANG — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 19, 2024
18741740 SUBSTITUTED HETEROCYCLE FUSED GAMMA-CARBOLINES SYNTHESIS O DELL, DAVID K 1621 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 12, 2024
18481168 NOVEL METHODS RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, VALERIE 1600 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Oct 04, 2023
18320173 NOVEL METHODS CHONG, YONG SOO 1623 DP Final Rejection — Pending May 18, 2023
18042103 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS FETTEROLF, BRANDON J 1626 §103 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Feb 17, 2023
18007018 NOVEL USES SHOWALTER, ALEXANDER KEITH 1629 §103 Non-Final OA 60d overdue Pending Jan 26, 2023
17127867 METHODS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA TREATMENT LEE, ANDREW P 1691 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 18, 2020

Managing Intra-cellular Therapies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month