Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Inventronics GmbH

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Inventronics GmbH currently has 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, meaning each application is being reviewed by a different person. However, both actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a shared technical and administrative environment for the prosecution. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit may provide some consistency in the technical standards and prior art used for both of the 2 pending actions.

The busiest examiner, SATHIRAJU, SRINIVAS, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This busiest examiner pending count of 1 indicates that the workload is divided equally between the 2 distinct examiners. While the applicant must navigate the styles of two different examiners, the concentration in 1 distinct art unit implies that the examiners likely share similar prior art resources and internal guidelines. Practitioners should look for commonalities in the feedback received from the 2 distinct examiners to develop a more efficient response strategy. The resolution of these 2 pending office actions will depend on addressing the specific concerns of each examiner within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The shared art unit environment allows for a more coordinated approach than if the 2 actions were in different units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SATHIRAJU, SRINIVAS 1 88.9% +6.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19116523 LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM SATHIRAJU, SRINIVAS —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19116523 LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM SATHIRAJU, SRINIVAS — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2025

Managing Inventronics GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month