1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Inventronics GmbH currently has 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, meaning each application is being reviewed by a different person. However, both actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a shared technical and administrative environment for the prosecution. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit may provide some consistency in the technical standards and prior art used for both of the 2 pending actions.
The busiest examiner, SATHIRAJU, SRINIVAS, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This busiest examiner pending count of 1 indicates that the workload is divided equally between the 2 distinct examiners. While the applicant must navigate the styles of two different examiners, the concentration in 1 distinct art unit implies that the examiners likely share similar prior art resources and internal guidelines. Practitioners should look for commonalities in the feedback received from the 2 distinct examiners to develop a more efficient response strategy. The resolution of these 2 pending office actions will depend on addressing the specific concerns of each examiner within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The shared art unit environment allows for a more coordinated approach than if the 2 actions were in different units.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SATHIRAJU, SRINIVAS | 1 | 88.9% | +6.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19116523 | LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM | SATHIRAJU, SRINIVAS | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19116523 | LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM | SATHIRAJU, SRINIVAS | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 28, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial