Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Irinox S P A maintains a company patent portfolio within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently shows 1 pending office action, which is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. This indicates a highly concentrated prosecution effort at this stage of the company's patent development. The presence of 1 pending office action suggests a manageable workload for the legal team involved in responding to the USPTO.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is TEITELBAUM, DAVID J, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently on record. All activity is localized within 1 distinct art unit and involves 1 distinct examiner. This singular focus suggests a narrow technical scope for the pending matters within the USPTO. For a practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy is tied to the specific tendencies of TEITELBAUM, DAVID J within that 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of the 1 pending office action under a single point of review simplifies administrative tracking but increases the impact of individual examiner preferences.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEITELBAUM, DAVID J | 1 | 68.7% | +24.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18907263 | REFRIGERATING MACHINE FOR FOOD PRODUCTS AND RELATED OPERATING METHOD | TEITELBAUM, DAVID J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18907263 | REFRIGERATING MACHINE FOR FOOD PRODUCTS AND RELATED OPERATING METHOD | TEITELBAUM, DAVID J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3763 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18907263 | REFRIGERATING MACHINE FOR FOOD PRODUCTS AND RELATED OPERATING METHOD | TEITELBAUM, DAVID J | 3763 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial