Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha Ltd.

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JUSTICE, GINA CHIEUN YU 1 55.3% +8.2%
DAVIDSON IV, CULLEN LEE GARRETT 1 36.5% +46.7%
PIPIC, ALMA 1 54.5% +55.6%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17775912 DISPERSION OF TITANIUM DIOXIDE MICROPARTICLES IN ORGANIC SOLVENT, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND USE OF SAME DAVIDSON IV, CULLEN LEE GARRETT 10d overdue
17630404 AGRICULTURAL FORMULATION PIPIC, ALMA 21d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1617 2
1767 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17784851 METHOD WHICH BRINGS BENEFITS TO HEALTH AND/OR GROWTH OF USEFUL PLANTS JUSTICE, GINA CHIEUN YU 1617 §103 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Jun 13, 2022
17775912 DISPERSION OF TITANIUM DIOXIDE MICROPARTICLES IN ORGANIC SOLVENT, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND USE OF SAME DAVIDSON IV, CULLEN LEE GARRETT 1767 §103 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending May 11, 2022
17630404 AGRICULTURAL FORMULATION PIPIC, ALMA 1617 §103 Final Rejection 21d Pending Jan 26, 2022

Managing Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month