Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Iv Technologies Co. Ltd. currently manages a patent portfolio with 1 pending office action. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating that the company's current prosecution is not spread across different examiners. The portfolio is active within 1 distinct art unit, which defines the technical classification of the pending work.
The busiest examiner for this company is NEIBAUR, ROBERT F, who is currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This examiner's role is significant as they are the sole point of contact for the company's active patent office business. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy is highly concentrated, focusing on the specific requirements of a single administrative channel.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEIBAUR, ROBERT F | 1 | 76.8% | +31.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18661715 | POLISHING PAD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF POLISHING PAD AND POLISHING METHOD | NEIBAUR, ROBERT F | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18661715 | POLISHING PAD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF POLISHING PAD AND POLISHING METHOD | NEIBAUR, ROBERT F | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 4100 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18661715 | POLISHING PAD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF POLISHING PAD AND POLISHING METHOD | NEIBAUR, ROBERT F | 4100 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial