Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jai Ltd. is active in the Communications technology area and currently has 1 pending office action. This action is located within 1 distinct art unit, which is consistent with the company's focus on communications technologies. The presence of only 1 pending matter indicates a streamlined prosecution phase for the company's current patent filings.
The company's current workload is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. BITOR, RENAE ALLYN is the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. This examiner is the only individual currently reviewing the company's patent applications. This concentration of 1 pending office action under 1 distinct examiner in the Communications field allows for a very focused legal strategy.
Because BITOR, RENAE ALLYN is the sole examiner, her specific history and preferences will determine the success of the 1 busiest examiner pending action. This lack of examiner diversity reduces the complexity of managing the portfolio's current active matters. Practitioners can focus their resources on addressing the specific concerns of this 1 distinct examiner within the 1 distinct art unit. This targeted approach is essential for resolving the current 1 pending office action efficiently.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BITOR, RENAE ALLYN | 1 | 84.4% | +26.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18714210 | PICTURE IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGING APPARATUS, AND PICTURE IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | BITOR, RENAE ALLYN | 39d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18714210 | PICTURE IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGING APPARATUS, AND PICTURE IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | BITOR, RENAE ALLYN | 39d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2663 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18714210 | PICTURE IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGING APPARATUS, AND PICTURE IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | BITOR, RENAE ALLYN | 2663 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 39d | Pending | May 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial