Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
JAMCO Corporation has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are split between a pair of distinct art units and a pair of distinct examiners, indicating a lack of overlap in the current prosecution pipeline. DANGOL, ASHESH is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, which accounts for a portion of the active cases.
With 2 pending office actions and a pair of distinct examiners, each matter is being handled independently by a different person. The presence of a pair of distinct art units further suggests that these cases involve different technical specialties within the broader transportation and mechanical systems field. Because there is no overlap in examiners or art units for the pending actions, the company must approach each case as a unique interaction. The prosecution strategy cannot rely on examiner consistency, as a pair of distinct examiners are involved. Practitioners should prepare for different sets of art unit specific requirements across the 2 pending office actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DANGOL, ASHESH | 1 | 69.1% | +51.1% |
| LUK, EMMANUEL S | 1 | 71.5% | +26.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19410669 | SEAT UNIT AND TABLE UNIT | DANGOL, ASHESH | — |
| 18996953 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING COMPOSITE MATERIAL COMPONENT AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING COMPOSITE MATERIAL COMPONENT | LUK, EMMANUEL S | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19410669 | SEAT UNIT AND TABLE UNIT | DANGOL, ASHESH | — |
| 18996953 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING COMPOSITE MATERIAL COMPONENT AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING COMPOSITE MATERIAL COMPONENT | LUK, EMMANUEL S | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3642 | 1 |
| 1744 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19410669 | SEAT UNIT AND TABLE UNIT | DANGOL, ASHESH | 3642 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 05, 2025 |
| 18996953 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING COMPOSITE MATERIAL COMPONENT AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING COMPOSITE MATERIAL COMPONENT | LUK, EMMANUEL S | 1744 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial