Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

James L Orrington Ii D D S P C

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

James L Orrington Ii D D S P C currently manages 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. All 3 matters are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit and are assigned to 1 distinct examiner. This indicates a high level of consistency in the examination environment for the company's current filings. Having 3 pending office actions under a single examiner allows for a more unified prosecution strategy compared to portfolios spread across multiple units.

SIPPEL, RACHEL T is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 3 pending office actions. This individual is responsible for the entirety of the company's active docket. Prosecution success depends on navigating the specific feedback and requirements of this single examiner across multiple applications. Since the busiest examiner pending count is 3, the examiner has a comprehensive view of the company's current mechanical engineering claims. This concentration within 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner simplifies the administrative aspects of prosecution but increases the impact of this single examiner's decisions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIPPEL, RACHEL T 3 52.5% +58.2%
LUCCHESI, NICHOLAS D 1 78.4% +9.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17746573 MECHANICAL COLLAR AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS LUCCHESI, NICHOLAS D 244d overdue
18753277 GAS PURIFICATION APPARATUS FOR NASAL APPLICATION SIPPEL, RACHEL T —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18753277 GAS PURIFICATION APPARATUS FOR NASAL APPLICATION SIPPEL, RACHEL T —
17994293 AIR PURIFICATION APPARATUS FOR NASAL APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED CASE SIPPEL, RACHEL T —
17982355 AIR PURIFICATION APPARATUS FOR NASAL APPLICATION SIPPEL, RACHEL T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3785 3
3772 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18753277 GAS PURIFICATION APPARATUS FOR NASAL APPLICATION SIPPEL, RACHEL T 3785 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 25, 2024
17994293 AIR PURIFICATION APPARATUS FOR NASAL APPLICATION AND ASSOCIATED CASE SIPPEL, RACHEL T 3785 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2022
17982355 AIR PURIFICATION APPARATUS FOR NASAL APPLICATION SIPPEL, RACHEL T 3785 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 07, 2022
17746573 MECHANICAL COLLAR AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS LUCCHESI, NICHOLAS D 3772 §102§103 Final Rejection 244d overdue Pending May 17, 2022

Managing James L Orrington Ii D D S P C's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does James L Orrington Ii D D S P C have?

James L Orrington Ii D D S P C has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most James L Orrington Ii D D S P C applications?

Rachel T Sippel has the most, with 3 of James L Orrington Ii D D S P C's pending office actions.

What technology area are James L Orrington Ii D D S P C's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month