Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Japan Electronic Materials Corporation

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Japan Electronic Materials Corporation has 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, but both are located within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that while different individuals are reviewing the applications, they are working within the same technical and administrative framework. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit may provide some consistency in the technical standards and prior art used for both of the 2 pending actions.

The busiest examiner, SCHINDLER, DAVID M, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This busiest examiner pending count of 1 indicates that the 2 pending actions are distributed equally between the 2 distinct examiners. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit implies that the examiners likely share similar prior art resources and internal guidelines for the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field. Practitioners should look for commonalities in the feedback received from the 2 distinct examiners to develop a more efficient response strategy. The resolution of these 2 pending office actions will depend on addressing the specific concerns of each examiner within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The shared art unit environment allows for a more coordinated approach than if the 2 actions were in different units. Successful prosecution will require balancing the unique preferences of the 2 distinct examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
3
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SCHINDLER, DAVID M 1 40.6% +23.8%
RIOS RUSSO, RAUL J 1 87.3% +8.6%
PATEL, PARESH H 1 79.6% -1.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19113819 CANTILEVER-TYPE PROBE FOR PROBE CARD RIOS RUSSO, RAUL J —
18004767 PROBE OF PROBE CARD USE INCLUDING DEFORMATION REGIONS, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME PATEL, PARESH H —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18847269 PROBE CARD SCHINDLER, DAVID M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2858 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18847269 PROBE CARD SCHINDLER, DAVID M 2858 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2025
19113819 CANTILEVER-TYPE PROBE FOR PROBE CARD RIOS RUSSO, RAUL J 2858 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 20, 2025
18004767 PROBE OF PROBE CARD USE INCLUDING DEFORMATION REGIONS, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME PATEL, PARESH H 2858 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 09, 2023

Managing Japan Electronic Materials Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Japan Electronic Materials Corporation have?

Japan Electronic Materials Corporation has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Japan Electronic Materials Corporation applications?

David M Schindler has the most, with 1 of Japan Electronic Materials Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Japan Electronic Materials Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month