Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Javelo Health Limited is managing 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. While both actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, they are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners. This concentration within a single art unit suggests a specific technical focus, even though the individual applications are being handled by different people.
The busiest examiner, DARB, HAMZA A., is currently handling 1 pending action. This distribution shows that although the company's current patent applications fall within a single art unit, they are being evaluated by two different individuals. This requires the company to navigate 2 distinct examiner styles for their 2 pending office actions. Practitioners should be prepared to address varying interpretations of the same art unit's standards, as each of the examiners may have a different approach to the medical device technologies presented in these applications.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DARB, HAMZA A. | 1 | 74.4% | +30.9% |
| KASHYAP, ESHA PRAKASH | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18288130 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SECUREMENT OF A FLEXIBLE CONDUIT | KASHYAP, ESHA PRAKASH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18293620 | CONDUIT SECUREMENT DEVICE | DARB, HAMZA A. | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3783 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18293620 | CONDUIT SECUREMENT DEVICE | DARB, HAMZA A. | 3783 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 30, 2024 |
| 18288130 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SECUREMENT OF A FLEXIBLE CONDUIT | KASHYAP, ESHA PRAKASH | 3783 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial