Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jcu Corporation has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. HASKE, WOJCIECH is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, showing that the workload is split evenly across the two different examination groups. This distribution suggests a lack of examiner concentration, which may lead to varied prosecution experiences across the portfolio.
The 2 distinct art units involved indicate that while the portfolio is centered on Chemistry & Materials, it touches upon different technical niches. For a practitioner, this means that there is no single examiner whose historical data will dominate the outcome of the current docket. The presence of 2 distinct examiners requires a flexible prosecution strategy that can adapt to the different standards and practices of these various individuals.
With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct art units, the company's innovations are being reviewed by different specialized groups within the USPTO. This breadth suggests that the Chemistry & Materials focus covers multiple sub-specialties. The 2 distinct examiners ensure that the 2 pending office actions are each given an independent look, reducing the risk that a single examiner's bias could affect both of the company's active applications.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HASKE, WOJCIECH | 1 | 73.2% | +17.6% |
| RUFO, LOUIS J | 1 | 54.6% | +22.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18871173 | PLATING SOLUTION | HASKE, WOJCIECH | — |
| 18567596 | ADDITIVE FOR COMPOSITE PLATING SOLUTIONS | RUFO, LOUIS J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1794 | 1 |
| 1795 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18871173 | PLATING SOLUTION | HASKE, WOJCIECH | 1794 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 03, 2024 |
| 18567596 | ADDITIVE FOR COMPOSITE PLATING SOLUTIONS | RUFO, LOUIS J | 1795 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialJcu Corporation has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Wojciech Haske has the most, with 1 of Jcu Corporation's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
