Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Jenoptik Optical Systems GmbH

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Jenoptik Optical Systems GmbH is managing a patent portfolio in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area with 3 pending office actions. These actions are spread across 3 distinct examiners. Furthermore, the prosecution is taking place in 3 distinct art units, showing a high level of diversification in how the patent office is reviewing the company's technology. This distribution suggests that the company's filings cover a broad range of technical sub-specialties within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector.

KIANNI, KAVEH C is identified as the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, each examiner is responsible for exactly 1 matter. This 1-to-1 ratio between actions and examiners across 3 distinct art units indicates that the company is navigating three separate prosecution tracks. The lack of overlap suggests that the outcomes of these actions may be independent of one another, requiring distinct strategies for each examiner involved.

The fact that 3 pending office actions are being handled by 3 different examiners in 3 different art units means that the company must manage three separate administrative paths. Practitioners should be prepared for varied examination styles and potentially different prior art landscapes. The diversification across 3 distinct art units within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area highlights the technical breadth of the company's active patent applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
§102 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
33% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
33% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KIANNI, KAVEH C 1 87.2% +11.0%
WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J 1 42.9% +40.4%
GREENE, JOSEPH L 1 63.0% +35.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18291295 OPTICAL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN OPTICAL DEVICE KIANNI, KAVEH C —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17580194 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR MULTI-SPECTRAL IMAGING GREENE, JOSEPH L 60d
18291295 OPTICAL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN OPTICAL DEVICE KIANNI, KAVEH C —
17906957 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING A CAMERA IMAGE OF A WELDING SEAM FOR AN IMAGE PROCESSING-SUPPORTED LASER TRANSMISSION WELDING METHOD WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2874 1
3761 1
2443 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18291295 OPTICAL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN OPTICAL DEVICE KIANNI, KAVEH C 2874 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 23, 2024
17906957 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING A CAMERA IMAGE OF A WELDING SEAM FOR AN IMAGE PROCESSING-SUPPORTED LASER TRANSMISSION WELDING METHOD WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J 3761 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 21, 2022
17580194 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR MULTI-SPECTRAL IMAGING GREENE, JOSEPH L 2443 §103 Non-Final OA 60d Pending Jan 20, 2022

Managing Jenoptik Optical Systems GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Jenoptik Optical Systems GmbH have?

Jenoptik Optical Systems GmbH has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Jenoptik Optical Systems GmbH applications?

Kaveh C Kianni has the most, with 1 of Jenoptik Optical Systems GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Jenoptik Optical Systems GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month