Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
| §102 only | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEDEON, BRIAN T | 1 | 87.3% | +7.0% |
| HO, TAN-UYEN THI | 1 | 21.2% | +21.0% |
| DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE | 1 | 40.9% | +41.7% |
| ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB | 1 | 62.2% | +23.2% |
| PASQUALINI, HANNA LOUISE | 1 | 40.0% | +33.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18689218 | DETACHMENT MECHANISM AND DELIVERY CATHETER | GEDEON, BRIAN T | 50d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18556552 | VALVE PROSTHESIS | HO, TAN-UYEN THI | 5d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18001305 | CONTROL HANDLE, BENDING CONTROL LINE AND IMPLANT DELIVERY DEVICE | PASQUALINI, HANNA LOUISE | 79d overdue |
| 18278135 | IMPLANT DELIVERY APPARATUS AND IMPLANT DELIVERY SYSTEM | ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB | 4d overdue |
| 18556552 | VALVE PROSTHESIS | HO, TAN-UYEN THI | 5d |
| 18553338 | DELIVERY CATHETER, IMPLANT DELIVERY SYSTEM, AND WORKING METHOD | DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE | 50d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3774 | 3 |
| 3796 | 1 |
| 3771 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18689218 | DETACHMENT MECHANISM AND DELIVERY CATHETER | GEDEON, BRIAN T | 3796 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 50d overdue | Pending | Mar 05, 2024 |
| 18556552 | VALVE PROSTHESIS | HO, TAN-UYEN THI | 3771 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 5d | Pending | Oct 20, 2023 |
| 18553338 | DELIVERY CATHETER, IMPLANT DELIVERY SYSTEM, AND WORKING METHOD | DUDDEN, TERESA MARIE | 3774 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 50d | Pending | Sep 29, 2023 |
| 18278135 | IMPLANT DELIVERY APPARATUS AND IMPLANT DELIVERY SYSTEM | ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB | 3774 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Aug 21, 2023 |
| 18001305 | CONTROL HANDLE, BENDING CONTROL LINE AND IMPLANT DELIVERY DEVICE | PASQUALINI, HANNA LOUISE | 3774 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 79d overdue | Pending | Dec 09, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial