Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026

Jmc Corporation

4 pending office actions • 1 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MUSA, BUSHIRA 1
ANTOINE, LISA HOPE 1 16.0% +91.3%
GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 1 21.8% +7.4%
ANGELES, JOSE 1 36.4% +51.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17940319 CATHETER SIMULATOR AND HEART MODEL FOR CATHETER SIMULATOR ANGELES, JOSE 66d overdue
18374546 CATHETER SIMULATOR AND CEREBRAL BLOOD VESSEL MODEL GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 62d
18382120 CATHETER SIMULATOR AND HEART MODEL FOR CATHETER SIMULATOR ANTOINE, LISA HOPE

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17940319 CATHETER SIMULATOR AND HEART MODEL FOR CATHETER SIMULATOR ANGELES, JOSE 66d overdue
18382120 CATHETER SIMULATOR AND HEART MODEL FOR CATHETER SIMULATOR ANTOINE, LISA HOPE

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3715 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18922582 ORGAN MODEL FOR MEDICAL DEVICE MUSA, BUSHIRA §103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 22, 2024
18382120 CATHETER SIMULATOR AND HEART MODEL FOR CATHETER SIMULATOR ANTOINE, LISA HOPE 3715 §103 Final Rejection Pending Oct 20, 2023
18374546 CATHETER SIMULATOR AND CEREBRAL BLOOD VESSEL MODEL GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 3715 §102§103 Final Rejection 62d Pending Sep 28, 2023
17940319 CATHETER SIMULATOR AND HEART MODEL FOR CATHETER SIMULATOR ANGELES, JOSE 3715 §103§112 Non-Final OA 66d overdue Pending Sep 08, 2022

Managing Jmc Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month