Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Jokoh Co. Ltd. is currently addressing 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio's activity is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a narrow technical focus for the company's current patent applications. There is 1 distinct examiner assigned to the portfolio, centralizing the communication for the active matter. This structure within 1 distinct art unit simplifies the prosecution process by limiting the number of active legal fronts.
The busiest examiner for the company is LE, AUSTIN Q, who is managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner is responsible for the entirety of the 1 pending office action currently active for the company. To achieve allowance, the prosecution must address the specific concerns of LE, AUSTIN Q within the 1 distinct art unit assigned to this 1 pending office action. The company's current success in the Chemistry & Materials area depends on the resolution of this matter with the 1 distinct examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LE, AUSTIN Q | 1 | 49.7% | +31.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18191164 | PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED BLOCK PREPARATION DEVICE | LE, AUSTIN Q | 15d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18191164 | PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED BLOCK PREPARATION DEVICE | LE, AUSTIN Q | 15d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18191164 | PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED BLOCK PREPARATION DEVICE | LE, AUSTIN Q | 1796 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Mar 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial