Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kanrin Co. Ltd. is active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's patent prosecution currently involves 1 pending office action, representing the active workload before the patent office. This action suggests a focused effort on a specific set of claims or an application within the broader technical field.
The portfolio's prosecution is centralized, with 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit managing the current filings. This concentration within the identified art unit indicates that the technical subject matter is being reviewed by a specialized group of examiners familiar with Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. Such a focus can lead to a predictable prosecution environment compared to portfolios spread across multiple units.
GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER is the busiest examiner for Kanrin Co. Ltd., currently handling 1 pending office action. As the examiner with an active case for the company, GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER is the primary point of contact for current prosecution matters. The resolution of the 1 pending action will depend on addressing the specific requirements set forth by this examiner, who currently manages the company's pending workload.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER | 1 | 16.1% | +33.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18027143 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18027143 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3626 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18027143 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | GILKEY, CARRIE STRODER | 3626 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial