Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Kempower Oyj

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kempower Oyj currently faces 2 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, showing a lack of examiner overlap in the current portfolio. HENZE, DAVID V is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. With 2 pending office actions total, the workload is split between the identified busiest examiner and one other distinct examiner.

This distribution across 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's innovations may span different specialized sub-fields. Since there are 2 distinct examiners involved, the prosecution team must adapt to different sets of examiner preferences and timelines. HENZE, DAVID V, as the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action, manages a portion of the active matters. This decentralized approach means that the outcome of one matter is unlikely to directly influence the other, as they are being handled by different individuals in different units. The Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics portfolio requires separate strategies tailored to the 2 distinct examiners involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
§103 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
50% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HENZE, DAVID V 1 69.7% +23.2%
ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE 1 38.5% +24.4%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18696514 APPARATUS, ARRANGEMENT, CHARGING APPARATUS, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR CONTROLLING CHARGING EVENT HENZE, DAVID V —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18696214 CHARGING ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE 5d overdue
18696514 APPARATUS, ARRANGEMENT, CHARGING APPARATUS, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR CONTROLLING CHARGING EVENT HENZE, DAVID V —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2859 1
3626 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18696514 APPARATUS, ARRANGEMENT, CHARGING APPARATUS, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR CONTROLLING CHARGING EVENT HENZE, DAVID V 2859 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2024
18696214 CHARGING ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE 3626 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Mar 27, 2024

Managing Kempower Oyj's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kempower Oyj have?

Kempower Oyj has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kempower Oyj applications?

David V Henze has the most, with 1 of Kempower Oyj's pending office actions.

What technology area are Kempower Oyj's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month