Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Kempower Oyj currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE. The concentration of the portfolio is reflected in the use of 1 distinct art unit for all current prosecution activity. Because the company has 1 pending office action, the workload is consolidated under 1 individual.
ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE serves as the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 pending office action. This represents the entirety of the company's pending workload. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner across 1 distinct art unit suggests a focused prosecution footprint in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. Practitioners should note that the current examiner, ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE, is responsible for the full scope of the company's active patent applications. This centralized structure means that any future filings in this area will likely encounter the same examiner and art unit environment.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE | 1 | 38.2% | +24.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18696214 | CHARGING ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE | 5d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18696214 | CHARGING ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | ROBINSON, AKIBA KANELLE | 3628 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Mar 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial