Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Khs GmbH is active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently includes 1 pending office action, which represents the current scope of active engagement with the patent office. This action is situated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the pending matter is focused within a specific technical domain. Such a narrow focus often simplifies the management of the prosecution timeline for the legal team.
The data shows that 1 distinct examiner is involved in the portfolio's current activity. ABBY A JORGENSEN is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action under review. Since there is only 1 pending action in total, this examiner manages the current workload. This arrangement means that the progress of the portfolio's active prosecution is currently tied to the review and feedback of this 1 examiner within the 1 identified art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JORGENSEN, ABBY A | 1 | 74.0% | +14.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722114 | Distributing Conveyor for Distributing Packs | JORGENSEN, ABBY A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3651 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18722114 | Distributing Conveyor for Distributing Packs | JORGENSEN, ABBY A | 3651 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 20, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial