Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Kicteam Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kicteam Inc. is currently managing 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 3 actions are being reviewed by 3 distinct examiners, meaning each case has a unique individual assigned to it. The prosecution is organized across 2 distinct art units, suggesting some technical overlap. The 3 pending office actions represent a small but fragmented set of active cases.

LEE, DOUGLAS is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. This is consistent with the 3 distinct examiners each handling one of the 3 pending office actions. The 2 distinct art units mean that at least two of the 3 distinct examiners are likely working within the same technical group. This concentration in 2 distinct art units provides a slightly more stable procedural environment than if each action were in a different unit.

Practitioners must adapt to 3 different examination styles while navigating only 2 distinct art units. The 3 distinct examiners still require individual attention for each of the 3 pending office actions. However, the shared context of the 2 distinct art units may allow for some consistency in technical arguments. Strategy should focus on the specific tendencies of LEE, DOUGLAS and the other two examiners within these specialized art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, DOUGLAS 1 45.3% +13.7%
GUIDOTTI, LAURA COLE 1 62.1% +29.1%
HENSON, KATINA N 1 56.8% +31.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18167561 DUAL-SIDED CLEANING SUBSTRATE FOR MEDIA TRANSPORT DEVICE HENSON, KATINA N 27d
18734014 Cleaning Wipe Tool and Method of Using Same GUIDOTTI, LAURA COLE —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18167561 DUAL-SIDED CLEANING SUBSTRATE FOR MEDIA TRANSPORT DEVICE HENSON, KATINA N 27d
19069781 CLEANING PRODUCT WITH ADHESIVE-INHIBITING PROPERTIES LEE, DOUGLAS —
18734014 Cleaning Wipe Tool and Method of Using Same GUIDOTTI, LAURA COLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3723 2
1714 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19069781 CLEANING PRODUCT WITH ADHESIVE-INHIBITING PROPERTIES LEE, DOUGLAS 1714 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2025
18734014 Cleaning Wipe Tool and Method of Using Same GUIDOTTI, LAURA COLE 3723 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 05, 2024
18167561 DUAL-SIDED CLEANING SUBSTRATE FOR MEDIA TRANSPORT DEVICE HENSON, KATINA N 3723 §102§103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Feb 10, 2023

Managing Kicteam Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kicteam Inc. have?

Kicteam Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kicteam Inc. applications?

Douglas Lee has the most, with 1 of Kicteam Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Kicteam Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month