Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Kidde Technologies Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kidde Technologies Inc. currently manages 5 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This indicates a relatively concentrated prosecution environment where multiple matters are handled by the same individuals, potentially leading to more consistent outcomes across the portfolio.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is KIM, CHRISTOPHER S, who is responsible for 3 pending office actions. This examiner manages a majority of the company's 5 pending actions, while the remaining 2 actions are split between the other 2 distinct examiners. This concentration suggests that the outcomes for a significant portion of the portfolio depend on the examination style and preferences of a single individual.

The presence of only 2 distinct art units for 5 pending office actions further highlights the technical focus of the current workload. With more pending actions than art units, the company's innovations are likely being reviewed within a narrow set of technical classifications. Practitioners should focus on the specific guidelines of these 2 distinct art units to optimize their approach for the 3 pending office actions in the busiest examiner's queue.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
1
Medium (20%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
80% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 3 63.3% +21.6%
NIA, FATEMEH ESFANDIARI 1 71.5% +19.9%
LA RAIA III, LAWRENCE 1 72.2% +36.2%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18830124 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS, FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF CONTROLLING FLOW OF FIRE SUPPRESSANT AGENTS KIM, CHRISTOPHER S —
18649149 FIRE DETECTION AND SUPPRESSION KIM, CHRISTOPHER S —
18083511 LITHIUM ION BATTERY GAS AND OPTICAL DETECTOR LA RAIA III, LAWRENCE —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18830124 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS, FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF CONTROLLING FLOW OF FIRE SUPPRESSANT AGENTS KIM, CHRISTOPHER S —
18756804 NOZZLE GEOMETRY TO CREATE ROTATIONAL VORTEX KIM, CHRISTOPHER S —
18649149 FIRE DETECTION AND SUPPRESSION KIM, CHRISTOPHER S —
18376295 POWDER LEVEL DETECTION SYSTEM NIA, FATEMEH ESFANDIARI —
18083511 LITHIUM ION BATTERY GAS AND OPTICAL DETECTOR LA RAIA III, LAWRENCE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3752 4
1727 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18830124 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS, FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF CONTROLLING FLOW OF FIRE SUPPRESSANT AGENTS KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 3752 §102§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 10, 2024
18756804 NOZZLE GEOMETRY TO CREATE ROTATIONAL VORTEX KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 3752 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 27, 2024
18649149 FIRE DETECTION AND SUPPRESSION KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 3752 §102§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 29, 2024
18376295 POWDER LEVEL DETECTION SYSTEM NIA, FATEMEH ESFANDIARI 3752 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 03, 2023
18083511 LITHIUM ION BATTERY GAS AND OPTICAL DETECTOR LA RAIA III, LAWRENCE 1727 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2022

Managing Kidde Technologies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kidde Technologies Inc. have?

Kidde Technologies Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kidde Technologies Inc. applications?

Christopher S Kim has the most, with 3 of Kidde Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Kidde Technologies Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month