Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Kids2 LLC has 5 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. ADAM C ORTIZ is the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 2 pending office actions. The remaining 5 pending office actions are split among the other 4 distinct examiners. This distribution across 3 distinct art units suggests that the company's Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems filings cover a few different technical areas within the USPTO.
The presence of 4 distinct examiners for 5 pending office actions means that most matters require a unique approach. While ADAM C ORTIZ handles 2 pending office actions, the company must still manage the other distinct examiner relationships. The 3 distinct art units further indicate that the 5 pending office actions are not technically identical, requiring the company to adapt to different procedural standards within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. Managing 2 pending office actions under ADAM C ORTIZ provides the only opportunity for consolidated prosecution strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (60%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORTIZ, ADAM C | 2 | 65.9% | +34.6% |
| ADEBOYEJO, IFEOLU A | 1 | 48.0% | +43.5% |
| CHEN, JOSE V | 1 | 78.0% | +15.1% |
| ISLAM, SYED A | 1 | 67.9% | +22.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19248266 | LEVELING INFANT BED | ORTIZ, ADAM C | — |
| 19079780 | MODULAR BASSINET / BEDSIDE SLEEPER | ORTIZ, ADAM C | — |
| 18937201 | CONVERTIBLE HIGH CHAIR SYSTEM | ISLAM, SYED A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19347909 | MULTI-MODAL CHILDREN'S ACCESSORY SYSTEM AND KIT | ADEBOYEJO, IFEOLU A | — |
| 19248266 | LEVELING INFANT BED | ORTIZ, ADAM C | — |
| 19079780 | MODULAR BASSINET / BEDSIDE SLEEPER | ORTIZ, ADAM C | — |
| 19074829 | TODDLER TOWER | CHEN, JOSE V | — |
| 18937201 | CONVERTIBLE HIGH CHAIR SYSTEM | ISLAM, SYED A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3673 | 2 |
| 3679 | 1 |
| 3636 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19347909 | MULTI-MODAL CHILDREN'S ACCESSORY SYSTEM AND KIT | ADEBOYEJO, IFEOLU A | 3679 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 02, 2025 |
| 19248266 | LEVELING INFANT BED | ORTIZ, ADAM C | 3673 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 24, 2025 |
| 19079780 | MODULAR BASSINET / BEDSIDE SLEEPER | ORTIZ, ADAM C | 3673 | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 14, 2025 |
| 19074829 | TODDLER TOWER | CHEN, JOSE V | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 10, 2025 |
| 18937201 | CONVERTIBLE HIGH CHAIR SYSTEM | ISLAM, SYED A | 3636 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial