Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kipu Quantum GmbH currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner working within 1 distinct art unit. POLLOCK, GREGORY A is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, handling 1 pending office action.
The presence of 1 pending office action suggests a highly specific prosecution focus for the company. By engaging with 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit, Kipu Quantum GmbH can concentrate its legal arguments on a single technical front. POLLOCK, GREGORY A is the sole individual responsible for evaluating the company's current claims. This structure simplifies the management of the 1 pending office action, as there is no need to coordinate between different examiners or art units. The company's progress in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector is currently tied to this single examination process.
For a patent practitioner, the 1 distinct art unit provides a stable regulatory environment for the pending matter. Since POLLOCK, GREGORY A is the only examiner involved, the company can tailor its responses specifically to his examination style. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current active prosecution at the patent office.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| POLLOCK, GREGORY A | 1 | 11.1% | +12.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18717573 | METHOD FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF A PORTFOLIO | POLLOCK, GREGORY A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18717573 | METHOD FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF A PORTFOLIO | POLLOCK, GREGORY A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3691 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18717573 | METHOD FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF A PORTFOLIO | POLLOCK, GREGORY A | 3691 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial