Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
KOPIN Corporation has 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located in 1 distinct art unit. This reflects the current focus for the company's pending prosecution efforts, with all activity concentrated in a pending matter.
AU, SCOTT D is the busiest examiner, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This examiner is the individual currently reviewing pending office actions for the company's portfolio. The 1 distinct art unit indicates that the technical subject matter of the pending application falls within a specific division of the Communications technology area.
With 1 pending office action, the company's current prosecution workload involves 1 distinct examiner. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit ensures a focused interaction with the patent office. This allows the company to concentrate its resources on the specific requirements of the pending application.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU, SCOTT D | 1 | 77.1% | +10.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18799204 | Display and AI (Artificial Intelligence) Methods for a Near-Eye Display System | AU, SCOTT D | 56d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18799204 | Display and AI (Artificial Intelligence) Methods for a Near-Eye Display System | AU, SCOTT D | 2624 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 56d | Pending | Aug 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial