Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Kpmg LLP

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

8 pending office actions • 6 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (25%)
§101 + other5 (62%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHOY, PAN G 1 24.4% +34.9%
SAMWEL, DANIEL 1 74.7% +24.4%
GUNN, JEREMY L 1 29.9% +45.8%
EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A 1 42.9% +40.4%
TIEDEMAN, JASON S 1 28.5% +34.9%
TSAI, JAMES T 1 63.4% +56.9%
PRESTON, JOHN O 1 28.4% +7.7%
FU, HAO 1 50.1% +24.8%

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17229562 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTELLIGENT REVIEW, PROCESSING AND REPORTING OF FINANCIAL DATA FU, HAO 4d overdue
17895825 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TAX CREDIT TOOL PRESTON, JOHN O 22d
18736202 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING AND PLANNING A PROJECT GUNN, JEREMY L 55d
18946394 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A GENERATIVE AI RAPID ASSESSMENT TOOL CHOY, PAN G —
18800789 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING AUTOMATED PROCESS AND APPLICATION TRANSFORMATION SAMWEL, DANIEL —
18588541 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A DATA ANALYSIS SUBSTANTIVE PROCEDURE FOR REVENUE TRANSACTIONS EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A —
18511699 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING PATIENT ACCESS IN A HEALTHCARE FACILITY TIEDEMAN, JASON S —
18477817 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ENHANCED KNOWLEDGE FRAMEWORK TSAI, JAMES T —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17229562 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTELLIGENT REVIEW, PROCESSING AND REPORTING OF FINANCIAL DATA FU, HAO 4d overdue
18736202 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING AND PLANNING A PROJECT GUNN, JEREMY L 55d
18946394 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A GENERATIVE AI RAPID ASSESSMENT TOOL CHOY, PAN G —
18800789 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING AUTOMATED PROCESS AND APPLICATION TRANSFORMATION SAMWEL, DANIEL —
18588541 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A DATA ANALYSIS SUBSTANTIVE PROCEDURE FOR REVENUE TRANSACTIONS EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A —
18511699 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING PATIENT ACCESS IN A HEALTHCARE FACILITY TIEDEMAN, JASON S —
18477817 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ENHANCED KNOWLEDGE FRAMEWORK TSAI, JAMES T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3624 2
3623 1
3683 1
2147 1
3693 1
3695 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18946394 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A GENERATIVE AI RAPID ASSESSMENT TOOL CHOY, PAN G 3624 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18800789 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING AUTOMATED PROCESS AND APPLICATION TRANSFORMATION SAMWEL, DANIEL — §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 12, 2024
18736202 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING AND PLANNING A PROJECT GUNN, JEREMY L 3624 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 55d Pending Jun 06, 2024
18588541 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A DATA ANALYSIS SUBSTANTIVE PROCEDURE FOR REVENUE TRANSACTIONS EL-HAGE HASSAN, ABDALLAH A 3623 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 27, 2024
18511699 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING PATIENT ACCESS IN A HEALTHCARE FACILITY TIEDEMAN, JASON S 3683 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 16, 2023
18477817 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ENHANCED KNOWLEDGE FRAMEWORK TSAI, JAMES T 2147 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 29, 2023
17895825 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TAX CREDIT TOOL PRESTON, JOHN O 3693 §101§112 Final Rejection 22d Pending Aug 25, 2022
17229562 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTELLIGENT REVIEW, PROCESSING AND REPORTING OF FINANCIAL DATA FU, HAO 3695 §101§103Other Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Apr 13, 2021

Managing Kpmg LLP's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month