Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kristopher Andrew Tate manages 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This one-to-one ratio between 3 pending office actions, 3 distinct examiners, and 3 distinct art units indicates that each matter is being handled in a completely different technical group by a different individual. There is no overlap in the current prosecution of these 3 pending office actions.
IMMANUEL, ILSE I is one of the examiners involved, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action is one of the 3 pending office actions in the portfolio. The involvement of 3 distinct art units suggests that the filings are technically diverse within the mechanical and transportation fields. For practitioners, this means that each of the 3 pending office actions requires a completely independent strategy tailored to the specific 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner involved. The 3 pending office actions represent a decentralized prosecution effort where each application must be advanced on its own merits within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. Practitioners should focus on the specific standards of each of the 3 distinct art units to be successful.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMMANUEL, ILSE I | 1 | 27.2% | +27.5% |
| GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | 1 | 64.9% | +33.3% |
| FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. | 1 | 25.4% | +24.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17910743 | CONTROLLER, PRODUCT TRADING SYSTEM, AND AUTOMATED ORDERING PROGRAM | GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | 98d overdue |
| 19139791 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ATTAINING ELECTRONIC CURRENCY BASE | IMMANUEL, ILSE I | 25d overdue |
| 17638598 | COMMODITY EXCHANGE SYSTEM, COMMODITY EXCHANGE METHOD, AND COMMODITY EXCHANGE PROGRAM | FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. | 23d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17910743 | CONTROLLER, PRODUCT TRADING SYSTEM, AND AUTOMATED ORDERING PROGRAM | GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | 98d overdue |
| 19139791 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ATTAINING ELECTRONIC CURRENCY BASE | IMMANUEL, ILSE I | 25d overdue |
| 17638598 | COMMODITY EXCHANGE SYSTEM, COMMODITY EXCHANGE METHOD, AND COMMODITY EXCHANGE PROGRAM | FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. | 23d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3699 | 1 |
| 3627 | 1 |
| 3689 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19139791 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ATTAINING ELECTRONIC CURRENCY BASE | IMMANUEL, ILSE I | 3699 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 25d overdue | Pending | Jun 16, 2025 |
| 17910743 | CONTROLLER, PRODUCT TRADING SYSTEM, AND AUTOMATED ORDERING PROGRAM | GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | 3627 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 98d overdue | Pending | Feb 27, 2023 |
| 17638598 | COMMODITY EXCHANGE SYSTEM, COMMODITY EXCHANGE METHOD, AND COMMODITY EXCHANGE PROGRAM | FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. | 3689 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 23d | Pending | Feb 25, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial