7 pending office actions • 4 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (29%) |
| §102 only | 1 (14%) |
| §112 only | 4 (57%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAJDA, KRISTIN ANN | 1 | 84.1% | +10.6% |
| ABDALHAMEED, MANAHIL MIRGHANI ALI | 1 | 50.4% | +41.3% |
| ISMAIL, REHANA | 1 | 78.9% | +30.2% |
| SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH | 1 | 68.8% | +28.3% |
| BRAUN, MADELINE E | 1 | 68.0% | +24.9% |
| MCANANY, JOHN D | 1 | 68.0% | +51.2% |
| BURKETT, DANIEL JOHN | 1 | 65.4% | +24.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18759253 | CDK2 DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | VAJDA, KRISTIN ANN | 89d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17597166 | IRAK DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | BURKETT, DANIEL JOHN | 164d overdue |
| 18486889 | SALT FORMS OF IRAK4 DEGRADERS | ISMAIL, REHANA | 132d overdue |
| 18030865 | STAT DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | MCANANY, JOHN D | 99d overdue |
| 18759253 | CDK2 DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | VAJDA, KRISTIN ANN | 89d overdue |
| 18559492 | DEUTERATED IRAK DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | ABDALHAMEED, MANAHIL MIRGHANI ALI | 32d overdue |
| 18453163 | CDK2 INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF | SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH | 8d overdue |
| 18547038 | SMARCA DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | BRAUN, MADELINE E | 8d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1622 | 2 |
| 1625 | 2 |
| 1624 | 2 |
| 1629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18759253 | CDK2 DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | VAJDA, KRISTIN ANN | 1622 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 89d overdue | Pending | Jun 28, 2024 |
| 18559492 | DEUTERATED IRAK DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | ABDALHAMEED, MANAHIL MIRGHANI ALI | 1622 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 32d overdue | Pending | Nov 07, 2023 |
| 18486889 | SALT FORMS OF IRAK4 DEGRADERS | ISMAIL, REHANA | 1625 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 132d overdue | Pending | Oct 13, 2023 |
| 18453163 | CDK2 INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF | SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH | 1629 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 8d overdue | Pending | Aug 21, 2023 |
| 18547038 | SMARCA DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | BRAUN, MADELINE E | 1624 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 8d overdue | Pending | Aug 18, 2023 |
| 18030865 | STAT DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | MCANANY, JOHN D | 1625 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 99d overdue | Pending | Apr 07, 2023 |
| 17597166 | IRAK DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF | BURKETT, DANIEL JOHN | 1624 | §103 | Final Rejection | 164d overdue | Pending | Dec 28, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial