Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Lagree Technologies Inc. has 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners. The portfolio is currently concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a focused technical scope for the company's mechanical engineering innovations.
The busiest examiner for the company is URBIEL GOLDNER, GARY D, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This indicates that the 2 pending actions are split between the 2 distinct examiners involved in the company's current prosecution efforts. Because both examiners are working within 1 distinct art unit, practitioners might expect a degree of consistency in the examination standards applied to the 2 pending office actions. The concentration in a single art unit allows for a more streamlined monitoring of prosecution trends for the company's medical device portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| URBIEL GOLDNER, GARY D | 1 | 73.4% | +60.6% |
| JIMENEZ, LOAN B | 1 | 5.9% | +1.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18354053 | Rower Accessory System for Exercise Machine | JIMENEZ, LOAN B | 12d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19200940 | Shrouded Exercise Spring Assemblies | URBIEL GOLDNER, GARY D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3784 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19200940 | Shrouded Exercise Spring Assemblies | URBIEL GOLDNER, GARY D | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 07, 2025 |
| 18354053 | Rower Accessory System for Exercise Machine | JIMENEZ, LOAN B | 3784 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 12d | Pending | Jul 18, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial