Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Laminaria Group AB

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Laminaria Group AB is currently managing 2 pending office actions. These matters are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, with 0 art units currently recorded in the data. WATTS, JENNA A is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action.

Since there are 2 examiners for 2 actions, the workload is evenly distributed. The lack of art unit data for these pending actions suggests they may be in a specific administrative or preliminary stage of prosecution. For a practitioner, the involvement of 2 distinct examiners provides two different perspectives on the company's patent applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WATTS, JENNA A 1 48.6% +54.0%
LEBLANC, KATHERINE DEGUIRE 1 34.6% +36.0%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18952849 NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS WATTS, JENNA A —
18917854 NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS LEBLANC, KATHERINE DEGUIRE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18952849 NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS WATTS, JENNA A 1791 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 19, 2024
18917854 NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS LEBLANC, KATHERINE DEGUIRE — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 16, 2024

Managing Laminaria Group AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Laminaria Group AB have?

Laminaria Group AB has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Laminaria Group AB applications?

Jenna A Watts has the most, with 1 of Laminaria Group AB's pending office actions.

What technology area are Laminaria Group AB's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month