Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Lego A/S

8 pending office actions • 8 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 46 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
7
Medium (88%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only6 (75%)
§102 only1 (12%)
§112 only1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
1
Semiconductors
12% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HYLINSKI, STEVEN J 1 75.4% +17.3%
GARBER, ERIN R 1 81.8% +16.2%
NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R 1 72.8% +21.1%
VELAZQUEZ VALENCI, AMELIA NMN 1
ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE, GERTRUDE 1 92.9% +4.4%
SIMMONS, SYDNEY JEANINE 1 100.0% +0.0%
FIGG, TRAVIS M 1 61.7% +16.7%
MELENDEZ, ARMAND 1 46.7% +42.7%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18570295 A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE, GERTRUDE 18d overdue
18709984 SENSOR MODULE FOR A MODULAR TOY CONSTRUCTION SET GARBER, ERIN R 19d
18011702 PICKING DEVICE SIMMONS, SYDNEY JEANINE 23d

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17966299 TOY BUILDING BRICKS MADE OF RECYCLED ABS MATERIAL FIGG, TRAVIS M 72d overdue
18750404 MODULAR TOY SYSTEM WITH ELECTRONIC TOY MODULES HYLINSKI, STEVEN J 3d overdue
18709984 SENSOR MODULE FOR A MODULAR TOY CONSTRUCTION SET GARBER, ERIN R 19d
18703645 A TOY BUILDING ELEMENT AND A METHOD AND A MOLD FOR PRODUCING SUCH A TOY BUILDING ELEMENT FOR A TOY BUILDING SET NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R 33d
17781953 A MOLD TOOL FOR INJECTION MOLDING MELENDEZ, ARMAND 57d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3715 1
2878 1
3711 1
2612 1
3661 1
3654 1
1783 1
1759 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18750404 MODULAR TOY SYSTEM WITH ELECTRONIC TOY MODULES HYLINSKI, STEVEN J 3715 §102 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Jun 21, 2024
18709984 SENSOR MODULE FOR A MODULAR TOY CONSTRUCTION SET GARBER, ERIN R 2878 §112 Non-Final OA 19d Pending May 14, 2024
18703645 A TOY BUILDING ELEMENT AND A METHOD AND A MOLD FOR PRODUCING SUCH A TOY BUILDING ELEMENT FOR A TOY BUILDING SET NICONOVICH, ALEXANDER R 3711 §103 Non-Final OA 33d Pending Apr 22, 2024
18684017 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUGMENTED REALITY FOR A MOVEABLE REAL-WORLD OBJECT VELAZQUEZ VALENCI, AMELIA NMN 2612 §103 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Feb 15, 2024
18570295 A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE ARTHUR JEANGLAUDE, GERTRUDE 3661 §103 Non-Final OA 18d overdue Pending Dec 14, 2023
18011702 PICKING DEVICE SIMMONS, SYDNEY JEANINE 3654 §103 Non-Final OA 23d Pending Dec 20, 2022
17966299 TOY BUILDING BRICKS MADE OF RECYCLED ABS MATERIAL FIGG, TRAVIS M 1783 §103 Non-Final OA 72d overdue Pending Oct 14, 2022
17781953 A MOLD TOOL FOR INJECTION MOLDING MELENDEZ, ARMAND 1759 §103 Final Rejection 57d Pending Jun 02, 2022

Managing Lego A/S's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month