Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Leidos Security Detection & Automation Inc.

Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Leidos Security Detection & Automation Inc. is managing 2 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These actions are split between distinct examiners, with each examiner handling one case. Prosecution is distributed across 2 distinct art units, indicating technical variety even within this small portfolio. SETH, MANAV is the busiest examiner, currently holding 1 pending action.

With the 2 pending office actions and the distinct examiners, the practitioner must navigate different examination styles. The involvement of the 2 distinct art units suggests that the Communications applications are being reviewed in different specialized groups. SETH, MANAV is responsible for 1 pending action, making his feedback as significant as the other examiner in the portfolio. The pending office actions represent the current active prosecution for Leidos Security Detection & Automation Inc. Because there are distinct art units, the practitioner cannot assume that a strategy used in one case will directly apply to the other. This diversity in both examiners and art units for the pending actions requires a broad tactical approach. Practitioners should monitor the distinct examiners for unique requirements in the Communications field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
50% of docket
1
Semiconductors
50% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SETH, MANAV 1 90.7% +8.0%
LEE, SHUN K 1 42.6% +16.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18890446 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OBJECT THREAT DETECTION USING HYBRID ANALYSIS SETH, MANAV —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18460250 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATING A SCAN OF AN OBJECT LEE, SHUN K 28d overdue

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18460250 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATING A SCAN OF AN OBJECT LEE, SHUN K 28d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2672 1
2884 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18890446 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OBJECT THREAT DETECTION USING HYBRID ANALYSIS SETH, MANAV 2672 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 19, 2024
18460250 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATING A SCAN OF AN OBJECT LEE, SHUN K 2884 §103§112 Non-Final OA 28d overdue Pending Sep 01, 2023

Managing Leidos Security Detection & Automation Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Leidos Security Detection & Automation Inc. have?

Leidos Security Detection & Automation Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Leidos Security Detection & Automation Inc. applications?

Manav Seth has the most, with 1 of Leidos Security Detection & Automation Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Leidos Security Detection & Automation Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month