Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIDANU, GEDEON M | 1 | 81.3% | +14.5% |
| NIMOX, RAYMOND LONDALE | 1 | 70.1% | +11.0% |
| AKRAM, IMRAN | 1 | 64.3% | +43.1% |
| NATH, SUMAN KUMAR | 1 | 82.9% | +22.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18109521 | IDENTIFICATION AND LABELING OF DEFECTS IN BATTERY CELLS | NATH, SUMAN KUMAR | 27d |
| 18431153 | CYCLE LIFE PERFORMANCE DETERMINATION FOR BATTERIES USING ACOUSTIC SIGNAL ANALYSIS | KIDANU, GEDEON M | 28d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18369422 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CALIBRATING TRANSDUCERS USED FOR ACOUSTIC SIGNAL ANALYSIS OF BATTERIES | NIMOX, RAYMOND LONDALE | 9d overdue |
| 18117815 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EVALUATING ELECTROLYTE WETTING AND DISTRIBUTION | AKRAM, IMRAN | 27d |
| 18109521 | IDENTIFICATION AND LABELING OF DEFECTS IN BATTERY CELLS | NATH, SUMAN KUMAR | 27d |
| 18431153 | CYCLE LIFE PERFORMANCE DETERMINATION FOR BATTERIES USING ACOUSTIC SIGNAL ANALYSIS | KIDANU, GEDEON M | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2855 | 2 |
| 2857 | 1 |
| 1725 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18431153 | CYCLE LIFE PERFORMANCE DETERMINATION FOR BATTERIES USING ACOUSTIC SIGNAL ANALYSIS | KIDANU, GEDEON M | 2855 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 28d | Pending | Feb 02, 2024 |
| 18369422 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CALIBRATING TRANSDUCERS USED FOR ACOUSTIC SIGNAL ANALYSIS OF BATTERIES | NIMOX, RAYMOND LONDALE | 2857 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 9d overdue | Pending | Sep 18, 2023 |
| 18117815 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EVALUATING ELECTROLYTE WETTING AND DISTRIBUTION | AKRAM, IMRAN | 1725 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Mar 06, 2023 |
| 18109521 | IDENTIFICATION AND LABELING OF DEFECTS IN BATTERY CELLS | NATH, SUMAN KUMAR | 2855 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Feb 14, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial