Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Liqxtal Technology Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus for the company's current filings. This localization can streamline the prosecution process, as the applicant only needs to navigate the procedural nuances of a particular examination group.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SHEN, PEIJIE, who is the distinct examiner involved. SHEN, PEIJIE is responsible for the pending office action, representing the entirety of the company's active workload. With a focused portfolio, the company can dedicate significant attention to the specific concerns raised by the examiner in the art unit. This approach may lead to a more efficient resolution of the case, provided the applicant can successfully address the technical requirements of the Communications technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHEN, PEIJIE | 1 | 79.3% | +17.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18413065 | See-through display, electrical controlling eyewear and system thereof | SHEN, PEIJIE | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2622 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18413065 | See-through display, electrical controlling eyewear and system thereof | SHEN, PEIJIE | 2622 | §103 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Jan 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial