Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
LITEPOINT Corporation has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, VELEZ, ROBERTO. The prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct art unit, which indicates a specialized technological niche within the semiconductors sector for the company's current patent efforts.
VELEZ, ROBERTO is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This single action constitutes the total 1 pending office action for the company. The focus on a single examiner and art unit indicates a streamlined examination path. For the practitioner, this means that the specific preferences and past decisions of VELEZ, ROBERTO will be the primary factor in the success of the 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector. By focusing on the requirements of the assigned examiner, the company can tailor its responses to address the specific concerns raised in the pending matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VELEZ, ROBERTO | 1 | 67.6% | +21.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18593279 | DETERMINING A QUALITY OF A CONNECTION BETWEEN A TEST SYSTEM AND A DEVICE UNDER TEST | VELEZ, ROBERTO | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2858 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18593279 | DETERMINING A QUALITY OF A CONNECTION BETWEEN A TEST SYSTEM AND A DEVICE UNDER TEST | VELEZ, ROBERTO | 2858 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial