Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Loop Robots

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Loop Robots has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is handled by 1 distinct examiner, TURNBAUGH, ASHLEIGH NICOLE. The prosecution activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a highly concentrated examination environment for the company's current patent filings. This singular focus within one art unit suggests that the company's mechanical and transportation-related intellectual property is being evaluated against a specific set of technical standards.

The busiest examiner, TURNBAUGH, ASHLEIGH NICOLE, is assigned 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner, the entire active portfolio at this stage is under the review of a single individual. This creates a direct and centralized point of contact for the company's prosecution efforts. Practitioners should note that the busiest examiner pending count of 1 represents the entirety of the current workload. This lack of examiner diversity means that the outcome of the company's pending matters is currently dependent on the interpretations of this one specific official.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TURNBAUGH, ASHLEIGH NICOLE 1 51.4% +6.9%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3667 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17988555 MIXED MODE MOBILE SERVICE ROBOT WITH MANUAL AND AUTONOMOUS MANEUVERABILITY TURNBAUGH, ASHLEIGH NICOLE 3667 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Nov 16, 2022

Managing Loop Robots's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month