Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Lorelli Technologies LLC operates within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company currently faces 2 pending office actions distributed across 2 distinct examiners. This distribution shows that the pending workload is divided between 2 distinct examiners for the portfolio. Each examiner is reviewing a pending matter at this stage of prosecution.
Prosecution is centralized within 1 distinct art unit. ROSEN, ERIC J is the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. While the workload involves 2 distinct examiners, the shared 1 distinct art unit indicates a consistent technical focus for these pending applications. This concentration within 1 art unit indicates that the company's current patent activity is focused on the technical area assigned to that unit.
The company's 2 pending office actions are managed by 2 distinct examiners. This ensures that the review process is not concentrated under an individual, even though the matters reside in 1 distinct art unit. The Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area defines the scope of these active matters, providing a clear technical context for the current prosecution activity.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROSEN, ERIC J | 1 | 41.3% | +22.8% |
| PATEL, YOGESH P | 1 | 57.9% | +58.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18497467 | INDIRECT BONDING TRAY FOR GUM COMPATIBILITY | PATEL, YOGESH P | 112d overdue |
| 18799265 | ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE WITH NON-SLIDING ARCHFORM | ROSEN, ERIC J | 35d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18497467 | INDIRECT BONDING TRAY FOR GUM COMPATIBILITY | PATEL, YOGESH P | 112d overdue |
| 18799265 | ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE WITH NON-SLIDING ARCHFORM | ROSEN, ERIC J | 35d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3772 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18799265 | ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE WITH NON-SLIDING ARCHFORM | ROSEN, ERIC J | 3772 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 35d overdue | Pending | Aug 09, 2024 |
| 18497467 | INDIRECT BONDING TRAY FOR GUM COMPATIBILITY | PATEL, YOGESH P | 3772 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 112d overdue | Pending | Oct 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial