Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Luftcar LLC has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio, which is classified under the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution is currently active in 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused review process for the company's intellectual property. The presence of 1 distinct art unit within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field indicates that the pending application is being evaluated by a specific technical group.
GMOSER, WILLIAM L is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action currently under review. This 1 action represents the total pending workload for Luftcar LLC. As a result, the company's current prosecution efforts are entirely concentrated on the feedback and requirements of GMOSER, WILLIAM L. For practitioners, this means the prosecution strategy is tied to a single examiner and a single art unit. The 1 to 1 ratio of pending actions to examiners provides a clear and singular point of contact for the company's active patent matters.
The 1 to 1 ratio of pending actions to examiners provides a streamlined prosecution path without the complexities of multi-examiner coordination. This data suggests a stable and manageable prosecution workload for the company's current intellectual property assets. For patent practitioners, this means that all current strategic responses and examiner interviews are concentrated with one specific official. This concentration allows for a highly tailored approach to prosecution, as the applicant can focus exclusively on the preferences and historical tendencies of GMOSER, WILLIAM L.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GMOSER, WILLIAM L | 1 | 78.4% | +28.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18829578 | AIR AND ROAD VEHICLE SYSTEM | GMOSER, WILLIAM L | 15d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18829578 | AIR AND ROAD VEHICLE SYSTEM | GMOSER, WILLIAM L | 15d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3647 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18829578 | AIR AND ROAD VEHICLE SYSTEM | GMOSER, WILLIAM L | 3647 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 15d | Pending | Sep 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial