Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Lyft Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

41 pending office actions • 21 art units • 40 examiners • 0 of 41 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 54 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Lyft Inc. has 43 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. Those matters are distributed among 41 distinct examiners and 20 distinct art units, indicating that most matters have separate examiner assignments and that the portfolio reaches multiple technical groupings.

CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N is the busiest identified examiner, with 2 pending matters. Because examiner dispersion is high, counsel may benefit from centralized claim guidance, standardized issue tracking, and targeted attention to the small identified cluster.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

41
Total Pending OAs
22
Non-Final OAs
19
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

28
Hard (68%)
11
Medium (27%)
2
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only10 (24%)
§101 + other13 (32%)
§103 only10 (24%)
§112 only2 (5%)
Double-patenting + other1 (2%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
5% of docket
3
Communications
7% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
35
Mechanical / Eng
85% of docket
1
Business / Other
2% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

410 h
Manual time on pending OAs
82 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
144 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
3.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N 2 28.1% +42.7%
KIM, PATRICK 1 26.3% +33.2%
WEISFELD, MATTHIAS S 1 62.3% +13.1%
HEFLIN, BRIAN ADAMS 1 39.8% +32.8%
NEUBAUER, THOMAS L 1 66.0% +19.9%
ULLAH, ARIF 1 48.1% +36.5%
MARTINEZ BORRERO, LUIS A 1 81.0% +17.3%
ISMAIL, MAHMOUD S 1 88.5% +11.6%
ELCHANTI, ZEINA 1 64.5% +24.9%
WALSH, EMMETT K 1 52.5% +20.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19239121 USING A PREDICTIVE REQUEST MODEL TO OPTIMIZE PROVIDER RESOURCES ISMAIL, MAHMOUD S —

Hard Cases (28)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18818373 DYNAMIC OPTIMIZED REASSIGNMENT OF PROVIDERS AT A GEOHASH LEVEL FEACHER, LORENA R 51d overdue
18616784 DETERMINING MATCHES USING DYNAMIC PROVIDER ELIGIBILITY MODEL SMITH-STEWART, DEMETRA R 44d overdue
17556024 GENERATING NETWORK COVERAGE IMPROVEMENT METRICS UTILIZING MACHINE-LEARNING TO DYNAMICALLY MATCH TRANSPORTATION REQUESTS KOESTER, MICHAEL RICHARD 8d overdue
18059253 PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION MATCH PROBABILITY INDICATORS BASED ON VARIABLE DIRECTIONAL FILTERS IN A TRANSPORTATION MATCHING SYSTEM NGUYEN, NGA B 13d
19388057 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMMEDIATE MATCHING OF REQUESTOR DEVICES TO PROVIDER DEVICES KIM, PATRICK —
19309221 DETECTING POSITIONING OF A SENSOR SYSTEM ASSOCIATED WITH A VEHICLE WEISFELD, MATTHIAS S —
19286616 GENERATING CONSOLIDATED GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR DISPLAYING DIRECTIVES OF DEVICES OF A DYNAMIC TRANSPORTATION NETWORK CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N —
19268557 PROVIDING EPHEMERAL-TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS IN REAL TIME FOR SHARING ACTIVE TRANSPORTATIONS HEFLIN, BRIAN ADAMS —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19388057 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMMEDIATE MATCHING OF REQUESTOR DEVICES TO PROVIDER DEVICES KIM, PATRICK —
19309221 DETECTING POSITIONING OF A SENSOR SYSTEM ASSOCIATED WITH A VEHICLE WEISFELD, MATTHIAS S —
19286616 GENERATING CONSOLIDATED GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR DISPLAYING DIRECTIVES OF DEVICES OF A DYNAMIC TRANSPORTATION NETWORK CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N —
19268557 PROVIDING EPHEMERAL-TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS IN REAL TIME FOR SHARING ACTIVE TRANSPORTATIONS HEFLIN, BRIAN ADAMS —
19259259 MICROMOBILITY TRANSIT VEHICLE CABLE LOCK ASSEMBLY SYSTEMS AND METHODS NEUBAUER, THOMAS L —
19254844 PROVIDING DYNAMIC ALTERNATE LOCATION TRANSPORTATION MODES AND USER INTERFACES WITHIN MULTI-PICKUP-LOCATION AREA GEOFENCES ULLAH, ARIF —
19242510 PROVIDING INFORMATION TO USERS OF A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM USING AUGMENTED REALITY ELEMENTS MARTINEZ BORRERO, LUIS A —
19239121 USING A PREDICTIVE REQUEST MODEL TO OPTIMIZE PROVIDER RESOURCES ISMAIL, MAHMOUD S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3624 6
3625 5
3628 4
3665 4
3661 2
3623 2
3675 2
3663 2
3629 1
3662 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19388057 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMMEDIATE MATCHING OF REQUESTOR DEVICES TO PROVIDER DEVICES KIM, PATRICK 3629 §101DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2025
19309221 DETECTING POSITIONING OF A SENSOR SYSTEM ASSOCIATED WITH A VEHICLE WEISFELD, MATTHIAS S 3661 §101§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 25, 2025
19286616 GENERATING CONSOLIDATED GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR DISPLAYING DIRECTIVES OF DEVICES OF A DYNAMIC TRANSPORTATION NETWORK CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N 3623 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 31, 2025
19268557 PROVIDING EPHEMERAL-TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS IN REAL TIME FOR SHARING ACTIVE TRANSPORTATIONS HEFLIN, BRIAN ADAMS 3628 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 14, 2025
19259259 MICROMOBILITY TRANSIT VEHICLE CABLE LOCK ASSEMBLY SYSTEMS AND METHODS NEUBAUER, THOMAS L 3675 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2025
19254844 PROVIDING DYNAMIC ALTERNATE LOCATION TRANSPORTATION MODES AND USER INTERFACES WITHIN MULTI-PICKUP-LOCATION AREA GEOFENCES ULLAH, ARIF 3625 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 30, 2025
19242510 PROVIDING INFORMATION TO USERS OF A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM USING AUGMENTED REALITY ELEMENTS MARTINEZ BORRERO, LUIS A 3665 §101§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 18, 2025
19239121 USING A PREDICTIVE REQUEST MODEL TO OPTIMIZE PROVIDER RESOURCES ISMAIL, MAHMOUD S 3662 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 16, 2025
19186497 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VERIFYING PROVIDER-RELATED INFORMATION ELCHANTI, ZEINA 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 22, 2025
19178572 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MATCHING TRANSPORTATION REQUESTOR DEVICES WITH AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES WALSH, EMMETT K 3626 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 14, 2025
19085985 VEHICLE SEAT ADJUSTMENT AND SECURING SYSTEMS AND METHODS BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL 3636 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 20, 2025
19081967 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ROUTING DECISIONS BASED ON DOOR USAGE DATA KUJUNDZIC, DINO 3658 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Mar 17, 2025
19021688 GUIDED BATCHING WILSON, NICHOLAS R 2611 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2025
19015366 DOCKING STATION FOR MICROMOBILITY TRANSIT VEHICLES BARNETT, DEVIN K 3675 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 09, 2025
18965700 MICROMOBILITY TRANSIT VEHICLE LOCK-TO MECHANISM SYSTEMS AND METHODS STABLEY, MICHAEL R — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 02, 2024
18960593 ALIGNING PROVIDER-DEVICE AXES WITH TRANSPORTATION-VEHICLE AXES TO GENERATE DRIVING-EVENT SCORES WANG, KAI NMN 3664 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18777227 OPERATIONS TASK CREATION, PRIORITIZATION, AND ASSIGNMENT KONERU, SUJAY 3624 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18932335 GENERATING AND PROVIDING A DEVICE NETWORK BALANCE USER INTERFACE TO A PROVIDER DEVICE CELANI, NICHOLAS P 2449 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 30, 2024
18912344 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CALIBRATION OF SENSORS ON A VEHICLE MALKOWSKI, KENNETH J 3667 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 10, 2024
18906828 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EFFECTING MAP LAYER UPDATES BASED ON COLLECTED SENSOR DATA KRETZER, CASEY L 2635 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2024
18818373 DYNAMIC OPTIMIZED REASSIGNMENT OF PROVIDERS AT A GEOHASH LEVEL FEACHER, LORENA R 3625 §101 Non-Final OA 51d overdue Pending Aug 28, 2024
18812519 PREEMPTIVELY NAVIGATING DRIVERS TO AN EVENT LOCATION TO TRANSPORT PASSENGERS UPON COMPLETION OF THE EVENT CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N 3623 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 22, 2024
18808615 MODE CHANGING OF A MOBILE COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND VEHICLE SETTINGS WHEN THE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE IS IN PROXIMITY TO A VEHICLE PHAM, TIMOTHY X 3648 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 19, 2024
18808827 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING SOURCE-AGNOSTIC TRAJECTORIES SILVA, MICHAEL THOMAS 3663 §103 Final Rejection 32d overdue Pending Aug 19, 2024
18770422 DETERMINING AND MAPPING LOCATION-BASED INFORMATION FOR A VEHICLE BOYLAN, JAMES T 2486 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jul 11, 2024
18740293 DISPATCHING PROVIDER DEVICES UTILIZING MULTI-OUTCOME TRANSPORTATION-VALUE METRICS AND DYNAMIC PROVIDER DEVICE MODES SANTOS, AARRON EDUARDO 3663 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 11, 2024
18637071 LOCALIZATION BASED ON SENSOR DATA KAZIMI, MAHMOUD M 3665 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 16, 2024
18616784 DETERMINING MATCHES USING DYNAMIC PROVIDER ELIGIBILITY MODEL SMITH-STEWART, DEMETRA R 3661 §101 Final Rejection 44d overdue Pending Mar 26, 2024
18613362 OPTIONS BASED ON TRANSPORTATION NETWORK CONDITIONS HENRY, MATTHEW D 3625 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 22, 2024
18356101 SYSTEM FOR NAVIGATING DRIVERS TO PASSENGERS BASED ON START TIMES OF EVENTS MERLINO, DAVID P 3665 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 20, 2023
18343627 SESSION-BASED TRANSPORTATION DISPATCH CHOY, PAN G 3624 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 28, 2023
18333340 GENERATING IMPROVED USER INTERFACES FOR PROVIDER COMPUTING DEVICES WITH COMPASS, DYNAMIC HALO, AND CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION SHAPES SINHA, SNIGDHA 2619 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 12, 2023
18186047 GENERATING AND PROVIDING DIGITAL NOTIFICATIONS FROM VEHICLE SERVICE FEATURES AND TRANSPORTATION MATCHING FEATURES UTILIZING AN INTELLIGENT RECOMMENDATION MODEL LABOGIN, DORETHEA L 3624 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 17, 2023
18059640 Forecast Availability for Docking Stations and Rideable Mobility Vehicles BOSWELL, BETH V 3625 §112 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Nov 29, 2022
18059253 PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION MATCH PROBABILITY INDICATORS BASED ON VARIABLE DIRECTIONAL FILTERS IN A TRANSPORTATION MATCHING SYSTEM NGUYEN, NGA B 3625 §101§102 Final Rejection 13d Pending Nov 28, 2022
17810708 UTILIZING COMPUTER MODELS TO DYNAMICALLY MATCH PROVIDER DEVICES AND PRIORITY REQUESTER DEVICES IN RESPONSE TO TIME PRIORITY AIRPORT TRANSPORTATION REQUESTS CLARE, MARK C 3628 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 05, 2022
17556024 GENERATING NETWORK COVERAGE IMPROVEMENT METRICS UTILIZING MACHINE-LEARNING TO DYNAMICALLY MATCH TRANSPORTATION REQUESTS KOESTER, MICHAEL RICHARD 3624 §101 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2021
17101831 Dynamic Scene Representation STRYKER, NICHOLAS F 3665 §103 Final Rejection 42d overdue Pending Nov 23, 2020
16827305 UTILIZING A REQUESTOR DEVICE FORECASTING MODEL WITH FORWARD AND BACKWARD LOOKING QUEUE FILTERS TO PRE-DISPATCH PROVIDER DEVICES ROTARU, OCTAVIAN 3624 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 23, 2020
16718131 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATING PROVIDER ACCEPTANCE PROBABILITY INTO TRANSPORTATION MATCHING MURRAY, WAYNE SCOTT 3628 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2019
16291964 OPTIMIZATION OF ON-DEMAND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PRASAD, NANCY N 3624 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2019

Managing Lyft Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Lyft Inc. have?

Lyft Inc. has 41 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 21 art units and 40 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Lyft Inc. applications?

Nadja N Chong Cruz has the most, with 2 of Lyft Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Lyft Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month