Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Lyte AI Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions in its portfolio. These 2 pending office actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, which ensures that each matter is reviewed by a different individual. The data shows 0 distinct art units, which may indicate that the applications are assigned to non-standard administrative categories within the office.
The busiest examiner for the company is ALEXANDER, WILLIAM R, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since this busiest examiner only handles 1 of the 2 pending office actions, the workload is split evenly between the 2 distinct examiners. This distribution means that the company's prosecution outcomes are not dependent on a single person's perspective. However, the 0 distinct art units figure suggests a unique administrative situation that practitioners should monitor closely as they navigate the prosecution process.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALEXANDER, WILLIAM R | 1 | 87.9% | +7.0% |
| HULKA, JAMES R | 1 | 76.3% | +11.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18931113 | Compact scanners | ALEXANDER, WILLIAM R | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18685236 | Multi-beam scanning systems | HULKA, JAMES R | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18931113 | Compact scanners | ALEXANDER, WILLIAM R | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 30, 2024 |
| 18685236 | Multi-beam scanning systems | HULKA, JAMES R | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial