Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ma Industries LLC currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The portfolio's active prosecution is concentrated on this single engagement at the present time.
KEASEL, ERIC S is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. Since the total count of pending office actions is 1, this examiner is responsible for all of the company's active work. This one-to-one relationship simplifies the prosecution process and allows for a consistent legal strategy.
The 1 distinct art unit involved provides a specific technical context for the examination. With 1 distinct examiner, the company can focus its efforts on resolving the specific issues raised by KEASEL, ERIC S. This centralized prosecution footprint minimizes the complexity of managing multiple active patent applications.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEASEL, ERIC S | 1 | 79.7% | +14.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18652489 | CROP INPUT APPLICATION APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS | KEASEL, ERIC S | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18652489 | CROP INPUT APPLICATION APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS | KEASEL, ERIC S | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3753 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18652489 | CROP INPUT APPLICATION APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS | KEASEL, ERIC S | 3753 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial