Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Magic Control Technology Corporation

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Magic Control Technology Corporation has 2 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct art units and 2 distinct examiners. This distribution indicates that the company's current filings cover different technical aspects of networking, requiring review by multiple specialized groups. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests a need for a prosecution strategy that accounts for different procedural norms.

KHALID, OMER is the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 1 pending office action. The workload is divided equally, with each of the 2 distinct examiners managing one of the 2 pending office actions. This lack of examiner overlap means that the company must adapt to two different sets of stylistic preferences and interpretations of the prior art. This 1 pending office action under KHALID, OMER represents half of the company's active workload.

With 2 pending office actions spread across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, the company faces a decentralized prosecution environment. Successful arguments in one case may not necessarily influence the outcome of the other due to the lack of overlap. This structure requires the company to manage two separate tracks of prosecution simultaneously, ensuring that each of the 2 pending office actions is addressed according to its specific examiner and art unit requirements.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
33% of docket
2
Communications
67% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JONES, CARISSA ANNE 1 72.5% +29.3%
KHALID, OMER 1 66.9% +22.8%
ENGLISH, ALECIA DIANE 1 42.2% +9.4%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18816458 WIRELESS MULTI-STREAM BIDIRECTIONAL VIDEO PROCESSING SYSTEM JONES, CARISSA ANNE —
18620138 WIRELESS MULTI-STREAM VIDEO PROCESSING DEVICE KHALID, OMER —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2691 1
2422 1
2625 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18816458 WIRELESS MULTI-STREAM BIDIRECTIONAL VIDEO PROCESSING SYSTEM JONES, CARISSA ANNE 2691 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 27, 2024
18620138 WIRELESS MULTI-STREAM VIDEO PROCESSING DEVICE KHALID, OMER 2422 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2024
17978509 INTERFACE EXTENSION DEVICE FOR SCREEN SHARING ENGLISH, ALECIA DIANE 2625 §103 Non-Final OA 70d Pending Nov 01, 2022

Managing Magic Control Technology Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Magic Control Technology Corporation have?

Magic Control Technology Corporation has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Magic Control Technology Corporation applications?

Carissa Anne Jones has the most, with 1 of Magic Control Technology Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Magic Control Technology Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month