Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Magnecomp Corporation

Technology areas: Communications • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Magnecomp Corporation is currently managing 3 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These 3 actions are being handled by 3 distinct examiners, meaning that every active case is under the review of a different official. This distribution suggests that the company's prosecution results are subject to the individual interpretations of a diverse group of examiners rather than a single point of contact.

The company's filings are situated within 2 distinct art units, which indicates that the pending office actions are somewhat concentrated in terms of administrative oversight. While there are the distinct examiners involved, the fact that they operate within 2 distinct art units may lead to some consistency in the prior art or legal standards applied to the applications. Practitioners should be prepared for the specific requirements of these different units.

KLIMOWICZ, WILLIAM JOSEPH is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. This 1 pending action represents the maximum workload for any single examiner within the company's total actions. The reliance on the 3 distinct examiners across the 2 distinct art units highlights a prosecution landscape where individual examiner interactions are the primary focus.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
67% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KLIMOWICZ, WILLIAM JOSEPH 1 80.9% +18.2%
KIM, MICHELLE JINJU 1 70.0% +50.0%
CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU 1 63.0% +24.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19288651 Gimbal Strut Configuration With A No Mid Strut Design KLIMOWICZ, WILLIAM JOSEPH —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19184880 Head Gimbal Assembly With Gimbal Tethers For Hard Disk Drive Device KIM, MICHELLE JINJU 24d overdue
16669251 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING PIEZOELECTRIC MICROACTUATORS HAVING WRAP-AROUND ELECTRODES CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU 30d
19288651 Gimbal Strut Configuration With A No Mid Strut Design KLIMOWICZ, WILLIAM JOSEPH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2688 2
3729 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19288651 Gimbal Strut Configuration With A No Mid Strut Design KLIMOWICZ, WILLIAM JOSEPH 2688 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 01, 2025
19184880 Head Gimbal Assembly With Gimbal Tethers For Hard Disk Drive Device KIM, MICHELLE JINJU 2688 §103 Final Rejection 24d overdue Pending Apr 21, 2025
16669251 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING PIEZOELECTRIC MICROACTUATORS HAVING WRAP-AROUND ELECTRODES CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU 3729 §112 Non-Final OA 30d Pending Oct 30, 2019

Managing Magnecomp Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month