Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RINK, RYAN J | 1 | 78.1% | +10.7% |
| STREGE, JOHN B | 1 | 86.8% | +14.0% |
| HANKS, BENJAMIN L | 1 | 21.0% | +29.9% |
| HIGGS, STELLA EUN | 1 | 39.1% | +34.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18145504 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING MEDICAL PROCEDURE ERGONOMICS | HANKS, BENJAMIN L | 51d overdue |
| 18622218 | DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR BONE BALANCE ADJUSTMENT BASED ON OSTEOPHYTE DETECTION | STREGE, JOHN B | 35d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17893318 | DIGITAL TWIN SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM | HIGGS, STELLA EUN | 60d overdue |
| 18145504 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING MEDICAL PROCEDURE ERGONOMICS | HANKS, BENJAMIN L | 51d overdue |
| 18768448 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING GUIDANCE FOR A ROBOTIC MEDICAL PROCEDURE | RINK, RYAN J | 23d overdue |
| 18622218 | DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR BONE BALANCE ADJUSTMENT BASED ON OSTEOPHYTE DETECTION | STREGE, JOHN B | 35d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3619 | 1 |
| 2669 | 1 |
| 3684 | 1 |
| 3681 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18768448 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING GUIDANCE FOR A ROBOTIC MEDICAL PROCEDURE | RINK, RYAN J | 3619 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 23d overdue | Pending | Jul 10, 2024 |
| 18622218 | DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR BONE BALANCE ADJUSTMENT BASED ON OSTEOPHYTE DETECTION | STREGE, JOHN B | 2669 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 35d | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 18145504 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING MEDICAL PROCEDURE ERGONOMICS | HANKS, BENJAMIN L | 3684 | §103 | Final Rejection | 51d overdue | Pending | Dec 22, 2022 |
| 17893318 | DIGITAL TWIN SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM | HIGGS, STELLA EUN | 3681 | §103 | Final Rejection | 60d overdue | Pending | Aug 23, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial