Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Maplebear Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

94 pending office actions • 28 art units • 67 examiners • 0 of 94 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 109 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Maplebear Inc. has 98 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The portfolio spans 71 distinct examiners and 28 distinct art units, reflecting a substantial docket with repeated technical-unit assignments and a wide examiner footprint.

FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. is the busiest examiner, with 7 pending matters. The concentration supports centralized review of those cases, including recurring claim and response issues. The larger distribution requires a broader operating model that organizes matters by art unit while preserving examiner-specific prosecution history across 71 relationships.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

94
Total Pending OAs
49
Non-Final OAs
45
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 31 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

9
Overdue
1
Due this week
14
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
5
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 31 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (9)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (14)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (5)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

77
Hard (82%)
12
Medium (13%)
4
Easy (4%)
1
Unknown (1%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only37 (39%)
§101 + other38 (40%)
§103 only12 (13%)
Double-patenting only4 (4%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (2%)
No statute on record1 (1%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
18
Information Tech
19% of docket
3
Communications
3% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
70
Mechanical / Eng
74% of docket
3
Business / Other
3% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

940 h
Manual time on pending OAs
188 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
329 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
8.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. 7 25.3% +24.5%
WEINER, ARIELLE E 4 43.4% +53.6%
JEANTY, ROMAIN 3 75.8% +19.5%
LEVINE, ADAM L 3 35.9% +40.0%
KANG, TIMOTHY J 3 45.5% +27.0%
SEIBERT, CHRISTOPHER B 2 58.2% +41.3%
PRESTON, ASHLEY DAWN 2 42.9% +27.5%
SINGH, RUPANGINI 2 35.2% +52.2%
LOHARIKAR, ANAND R 2 70.1% +25.7%
MUTSCHLER, JOSEPH M 2 60.6% +48.2%

Hard Cases (77)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18614563 USING A TRAINED MODEL TO PREDICT AND PREVENT FAILED DELIVERIES CLARE, MARK C 37d overdue
18769202 Personalized Ranking of Search Query Results Using Engagement-Independent Machine Learning Model for Cold-Start Items PRESTON, ASHLEY DAWN 23d overdue
18442878 Predictive Model for Key Item Classification and Fulfillment ALLEN, WILLIAM J 17d overdue
18626801 USER INTERFACE FOR DISPLAYING MODEL-BASED PREDICTION OF ORDER FEATURES CRAWLEY, TALIA F 16d overdue
18532541 Selecting Item Images for an Online Shopping Concierge Platform MISIASZEK, MICHAEL 16d overdue
18236371 DETERMINING GENERIC ITEMS FOR ORDERS ON AN ONLINE CONCIERGE SYSTEM WILDER, ANDREW H 4d overdue
18898272 SELECTING A LOCATION FOR ORDER FULFILLMENT BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PREDICTION OF INCOMPLETE FULFILLMENT OF THE ORDER FOR DIFFERENT LOCATIONS LEVINE, ADAM L 3d overdue
18967681 TRAINING A MODEL TO PREDICT LIKELIHOODS OF USERS PERFORMING AN ACTION AFTER BEING PRESENTED WITH A CONTENT ITEM WAESCO, JOSEPH M 7d

Interview Candidates (30)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18769202 Personalized Ranking of Search Query Results Using Engagement-Independent Machine Learning Model for Cold-Start Items PRESTON, ASHLEY DAWN 23d overdue
18898272 SELECTING A LOCATION FOR ORDER FULFILLMENT BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PREDICTION OF INCOMPLETE FULFILLMENT OF THE ORDER FOR DIFFERENT LOCATIONS LEVINE, ADAM L 3d overdue
19000089 PICKING SEQUENCE OPTIMIZATION WITHIN A WAREHOUSE FOR AN ITEM LIST JEANTY, ROMAIN 8d
18488811 TRAINED COMPUTER MODELS FOR AUTOMATIC SUGGESTION OF ALTERNATIVE ITEMS IN AN ORDER KANG, TIMOTHY J 20d
18906012 Self-Checkout Anti-Theft Vehicle Systems And Methods MUTSCHLER, JOSEPH M 28d
18771748 MEAL PLANNING USER INTERFACE WITH LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS SEIBERT, CHRISTOPHER B 28d
18587655 GENERATING QUERIES FOR USERS OF AN ONLINE SYSTEM USING LARGE LANGUAGE MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS AND PRESENTING THE QUERIES ON A USER INTERFACE KANG, TIMOTHY J 33d
18532978 PREDICTING AVAILABILITIES OF ITEMS AT LOCATIONS BASED ON AVAILABILITY FLUCTUATIONS AT DIFFERENT TIMES OF DAY WEINER, ARIELLE E 84d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3689 29
3688 14
3628 6
3624 5
3625 5
3627 4
2163 2
2156 2
2159 2
3621 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19294019 AUTOMATED SAMPLING OF QUERY RESULTS FOR TRAINING OF A QUERY ENGINE THAI, HANH B 2163 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 07, 2025
19281710 USER INTERFACE FOR ACCESSING MULTIPLE CATALOGS OF ITEMS AND INDICATING ITEMS ADDED FROM CATALOGS SEIBERT, CHRISTOPHER B 3688 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 27, 2025
19274955 MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR DETERMINING A TIME INTERVAL TO DELAY BATCHING DECISION FOR AN ORDER RECEIVED BY AN ONLINE CONCIERGE SYSTEM TO COMBINE ORDERS WHILE MINIMIZING PROBABILITY OF LATE FULFILLMENT JEANTY, ROMAIN 3624 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 21, 2025
19272278 ALLOCATING SHOPPERS FOR ORDER FULFILLMENT BY AN ONLINE CONCIERGE SYSTEM ACCOUNTING FOR VARIABLE NUMBERS OF SHOPPERS ACROSS DIFFERENT TIME WINDOWS AND VARYING CAPABILITIES FOR FULFILLING ORDERS JARRETT, SCOTT L — §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2025
19256149 METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND SYSTEM FOR TRAINING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TO GENERATE USER EMBEDDINGS AND RECIPE EMBEDDINGS IN A COMMON LATENT SPACE FOR RECOMMENDING ONE OR MORE RECIPES TO A USER PRESTON, ASHLEY DAWN 3688 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 01, 2025
19244538 Counterfactual Evaluation of Policies for Categories of Items Using Machine Learning Prediction of Outcomes JEANTY, ROMAIN 3623 §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2025
19241177 CERTIFIED DELIVERIES OF HIGH-VALUE ITEMS SINGH, RUPANGINI 3628 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2025
19217918 DETECTING USER ACTIONS BASED ON SMART CART SENSOR DATA KONERU, SUJAY 3624 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2025
19217924 HIGHLIGHTING TARGET ITEMS IN IMAGES CAPTURED BY SMART CARTS ZIMMERMAN, JEFFREY P 3628 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2025
19208438 CONTEXTUAL BANDIT MODEL FOR QUERY PROCESSING MODEL SELECTION HARPER, ELIYAH STONE 2166 §103Other Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending May 14, 2025
19207116 QUERY REFORMULATIONS FOR AN ITEM GRAPH LOHARIKAR, ANAND R 3689 §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 13, 2025
19086482 Self-Checkout Anti-Theft Vehicle Systems And Methods MUTSCHLER, JOSEPH M 3627 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 21, 2025
19081866 METHOD, MEDIUM, AND SYSTEM FOR RENDERING OF A PHYSICAL SPACE IN A VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENT ZIMMERMAN, MATTHEW E — §101§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 17, 2025
19062640 IDENTIFYING CANDIDATE REPLACEMENT ITEMS WITH A SOURCE SIMILARITY SCORE ROSEN, NICHOLAS D 3689 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 25, 2025
19041590 DYNAMICALLY GENERATING DESCRIPTIONS FOR ITEM GROUPINGS USING A MULTI-MODAL LARGE-LANGUAGE MODEL BECKER, TYLER JUSTIN 2657 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 30, 2025
19034409 DISPLAYING A DIGITAL REPRESENTATION OF AN ITEM TO A USER DURING ORDER FULFILLMENT BARGEON, BRITTANY E 3688 §101§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 22, 2025
19030474 USING LARGE-SCALE MACHINE-LEARNING MODELS FOR ORDER GENERATION FROM RECEIPT IMAGES LEVINE, ADAM L 3689 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
19015493 QUERY-PRODUCT ATTRIBUTE FEATURES WITH MACHINE-LEARNING LANGUAGE LEARNING MODELS LEVINE, ADAM L 3689 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 09, 2025
19012864 TRAINING A MACHINE LEARNED MODEL TO DETERMINE RELEVANCE OF ITEMS TO A QUERY USING DIFFERENT SETS OF TRAINING DATA FROM A COMMON DOMAIN GANGER, LAUREN ZANNAH 2156 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 08, 2025
19000089 PICKING SEQUENCE OPTIMIZATION WITHIN A WAREHOUSE FOR AN ITEM LIST JEANTY, ROMAIN 3624 §101 Final Rejection 8d Pending Dec 23, 2024
19000108 PROMPT ADAPTATION FOR MACHINE-LEARNING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLMS) WILLIS, AMANDA LYNN 2156 §103§112 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Dec 23, 2024
18972522 USING MACHINE-LEARNING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS TO PERFORM SMART ORDER UPDATES SINGH, RUPANGINI 3628 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18967681 TRAINING A MODEL TO PREDICT LIKELIHOODS OF USERS PERFORMING AN ACTION AFTER BEING PRESENTED WITH A CONTENT ITEM WAESCO, JOSEPH M 3625 §101 Final Rejection 7d Pending Dec 04, 2024
18967678 AUTOMATIC SELECTION OF DYNAMIC DATA ENTRIES FOR MULTIPLE DYNAMIC DATABASES FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. 3689 §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 04, 2024
18963705 UNIFIED EMBEDDING MODEL FOR INFORMATION RETRIEVAL AND CUSTOMIZATION SPIELER, WILLIAM 2159 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 28, 2024
18961059 TEXT-BASED EMBEDDINGS OF TREATMENTS FOR WARM-STARTING UPLIFT MODELS PATEL, DIPEN M 3621 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18951399 USING MACHINE-LEARNING MODEL OF AN ONLINE SYSTEM TO GENERATE A SOURCE-RELATED CONFIDENCE SCORE FOR SERVICING A LIST OF COMPONENTS REQUESTED BY AN ONLINE PLATFORM WEINER, ARIELLE E 3689 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18948027 ENABLING MULTI-LANGUAGE COLD START SEARCH USING A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL REN, ZHUBING 2658 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 14, 2024
18943691 INTEGRATING FEATURED PRODUCT RECOMMENDATIONS IN APPLICATIONS WITH MACHINE-LEARNED LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLMS) UBALE, GAUTAM 3689 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 11, 2024
18933820 USING A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL FOR ALTERNATIVE INGREDIENT DETERMINATION LADONI, AHOORA 3689 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18916461 OPTIMIZING TASK ASSIGNMENTS IN A DELIVERY SYSTEM SINGH, GURKANWALJIT 3625 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18906012 Self-Checkout Anti-Theft Vehicle Systems And Methods MUTSCHLER, JOSEPH M 3627 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 28d Pending Oct 03, 2024
18898272 SELECTING A LOCATION FOR ORDER FULFILLMENT BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PREDICTION OF INCOMPLETE FULFILLMENT OF THE ORDER FOR DIFFERENT LOCATIONS LEVINE, ADAM L 3689 §101 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Sep 26, 2024
18893843 USING A MACHINE-LEARNING MODEL TO GENERATE SUBSEQUENT ORDERS FOR PREVIOUSLY UNOBTAINED ITEMS MITROS, ANNA MAE 3689 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2024
18892150 GENERATING AN ITEM SELECTION SEQUENCE USING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR IDENTIFYING FOUNDATIONAL ITEMS LOHARIKAR, ANAND R 3689 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 20, 2024
18885294 ANOMALY DETECTION AND USER ATTRIBUTION USING MACHINE-LEARNING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS TRAN, TAN H 2141 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024
18827318 LEVERAGING DATA FOR PLATFORM SUPPORT USING LARGE LANGUAGE MACHINE-LEARNED MODEL-BASED AGENTS LEE, JENNIFER V 3688 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18820097 REINFORCEMENT LEARNING BASED OPTIMIZATION OF TEXTUAL ARTIFACTS USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BEAN, GRIFFIN TANNER 2121 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 29, 2024
18785665 GENERATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-BASED IMAGES USING LARGE LANGUAGE MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS STATZ, BENJAMIN TOM 2611 §103§112 Final Rejection 23d Pending Jul 26, 2024
18775459 Using a Machine Learning Model to Recommend Items from an Image of a Checkout Line Captured by a Client Device of a Picker Fulfilling an Order FRUNZI, VICTORIA E. 3689 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2024
18776104 CUSTOMIZING RECIPES GENERATED FROM ONLINE SEARCH HISTORY USING MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS MACKES, KRIS E 2153 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 17, 2024
18775446 PREDICTING USER BEHAVIOR FROM AN INITIAL CONVERSION EVENT HENRY, MATTHEW D 3625 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2024
18772774 USER EMBEDDING GENERATION USING LLM-GENERATED CONTENT EMBEDDINGS SULLIVAN, THOMAS J 3689 §101 Final Rejection 23d Pending Jul 15, 2024
18771748 MEAL PLANNING USER INTERFACE WITH LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS SEIBERT, CHRISTOPHER B 3688 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jul 12, 2024
18769202 Personalized Ranking of Search Query Results Using Engagement-Independent Machine Learning Model for Cold-Start Items PRESTON, ASHLEY DAWN 3688 §101§103 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Jul 10, 2024
18753912 RECOMMENDING CONTENT BASED ON A PREDICTED EXPLORATION SCORE FOR AN ONLINE SYSTEM USER SULLIVAN, THOMAS J 3689 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 25, 2024
18678484 MACHINE LEARNED MODEL FOR ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS FOLLOWING FAILED ATTEMPTS MISIASZEK, MICHAEL 3688 §101 Final Rejection 70d Pending May 30, 2024
18677640 USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) FOR AUTOMATED DIGITAL FLYER CONTENT GENERATION ANSARI, AZAM A 3621 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 29, 2024
18677770 PREDICTING USER LOCATION DURING AN ATTENDED DELIVERY USING A MACHINE LEARNED MODEL WALSH, EMMETT K 3628 §101 Final Rejection 29d Pending May 29, 2024
18676345 Machine Learning Prediction of User Type for Generating Personalized User Interface for an Online System SMITH, LINDSEY B 3688 §101§103 Final Rejection 70d Pending May 28, 2024

View all 94 →

Managing Maplebear Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Maplebear Inc. have?

Maplebear Inc. has 94 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 28 art units and 67 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Maplebear Inc. applications?

Victoria E. Frunzi has the most, with 7 of Maplebear Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Maplebear Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month