Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Griffin Tanner Bean, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as BEAN, GRIFFIN TANNER

Tech Center 2100 • Art Units: 2121 2147

This examiner grants 28% of resolved cases

Analysis

Griffin Tanner Bean, in Tech Center 2100 and Art Unit 2121, has 32 resolved cases. The allowance rate is 28.1 percent, which is relatively low and indicates a challenging prosecution environment for applicants. The interview lift of 15.3 percent suggests that interviews can provide a helpful boost, though the overall probability of success remains modest. This 15.3 percent lift is a critical tool for practitioners to consider when attempting to overcome the hurdles presented by the 28.1 percent allowance rate.

The median days to allowance for Bean is 1633, which is a very long duration for the patent acquisition process. Applicants should be prepared for an extended prosecution cycle when working with this examiner. Top companies like International Business Machines Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Robert Bosch GmbH are frequently represented in Bean's caseload. Firms such as HAUPTMAN HAM, LLP, CHIP LAW GROUP, and Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd navigate these cases and the 1633-day median pendency, using the 15.3 percent interview lift to improve their outcomes.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

28.1%
Allow Rate
-26.9% vs TC avg
75
Total Applications
+15.3%
Interview Lift
1633
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 32 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

37.9%
§101 Eligibility
10.2%
§102 Novelty
41.8%
§103 Obviousness
9.7%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18296165 APPARATUS AND METHOD WITH ACCELERATING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK Non-Final OA SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
17988739 STRUCTURED SPARSE MEMORY HIERARCHY FOR DEEP LEARNING Final Rejection Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
17719617 SUPER-FEATURES FOR EXPLAINABILITY WITH PERTURBATION-BASED APPROACHES Non-Final OA Oracle International Corporation
17395845 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR COMPRESSING A NEURAL NETWORK Non-Final OA Robert Bosch GmbH
18249389 Machine-Learned Discretization Level Reduction Final Rejection Google LLC
18247590 Method and Apparatus for Predicting Relevance Degree, and Method and Apparatus for Training Machine Leaning Module Final Rejection BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD.
18885411 Operation of a Neural Network with Clipped Input Data Non-Final OA HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
17212359 EVALUATING DEVICE, PLANT CONTROL ASSIST SYSTEM, EVALUATION METHOD, AND PROGRAM Final Rejection MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.
18263807 METHOD, DATA PROCESSING DEVICE, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT AND DATA CARRIER SIGNAL Non-Final OA VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
18061529 SEMI-SUPERVISED SIMILARITY-BASED CLUSTERING IN RESOURCE EVALUATION Non-Final OA International Business Machines Corporation
17685350 ADVERSARIAL DATA GENERATION FOR VIRTUAL SETTINGS Final Rejection International Business Machines Corporation
17480012 GRAPH NEURAL NETWORK (GNN) TRAINING USING META-PATH NEIGHBOR SAMPLING AND CONTRASTIVE LEARNING Non-Final OA International Business Machines Corporation
17115857 DATA-DRIVEN NEURAL NETWORK MODEL COMPRESSION Non-Final OA International Business Machines Corporation
18750724 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ENSURING INTEGRITY OF QUANTUM COMPUTER Non-Final OA Korea University Research and Business Foundation
18249162 Method and Apparatus for Weight-Sharing Neural Network with Stochastic Architectures Final Rejection Tsinghua University

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Griffin Tanner Bean's allowance rate?

28.1% of resolved applications examined by Griffin Tanner Bean were allowed (32 resolved cases), compared with 32.0% across Art Unit 2121 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Griffin Tanner Bean?

This examiner's interview lift is +15.3 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Griffin Tanner Bean take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Griffin Tanner Bean took 1,633 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Griffin Tanner Bean work in?

Griffin Tanner Bean examines applications in Art Unit 2121 in Tech Center 2100 (Computing & Software).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month